if i get it, then i would go for the console version

because they were almost the same

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Wired gave it another 8. http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2010/09/review-halo-reach/

Bungie tries. Kat, Noble 6's intelligence officer and estrogen-powered ass-kicker, is the most entertaining of your compatriots. But she and all the characters in Halo: Reach are one-note Johnnies, all swagger and no depth.

Sounds like Halo alright :P

Arbiterisl33t69

whats with your icon?

nice

I don't think that Reach will get a ten here. Mostly because a lot of the reviews are done by what the reviewer wanted the game to be and not what it was. Just like with Halo 3. Also, why is IGN a 9.5 on Metacritic when they gave it a ten? and fun fact. If you look at the AA scores on metacritic for reach, you will see they are all using the same age old argument that halo has no singleplayer and is a multiplayer game. Much like alot of other games that have come out lately :roll: How do games with no multiplayer not get judged . Great (although not perfect) single player + Perfect Multiplayer > Just one or the other.emperorzhang66

ign gave it a 9.5

i hate the 360 controller

yeah its a good game

i think they will post their review tomorrow

halo reach currently has a 95 on metacritic

gamespot will probably post the review on monday