[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"]I've played U2 on a full-HD 50 TV, and while it's an inspiring and one-of-a-kind adventure, the graphics are overratted and pretty muc hsuckShattered007
I was gonna buy a 50 inch Samsung but that model didn't have the 120Mhz and was more expensive. I might buy a bigger model when I take this one back to exchange (Lighting on the bottem is to high and coming through the screen). But the next model up from this is either the 47 inch at 240 or the LED at 240, either of which are just too much to spend on a TV. I got this TV at a steal. Was only $650 USD walking out the door. The others are $800 and $1600 respectivly. That's very cheap, I take it you're relatively poor for not anyway, I think we all know that U2's graphics are terribly overrated and nothing compared to games such as Crysis, but since this board is 90 % full of angry PS fanboys, no one is going to admit it, even thought it's a FACT, so I'm not even going to begin arguing
[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"][QUOTE="toast_burner"] playing a video game is not military training and thats a factrazgriz_101
But those playing MW2 are those with special interests in the subject military, and handling weapons, shooting, and so on.
no they dont.....its a form of entertainment people see CoD as if it were an action movie, its no indicator of people having a special intrest in the military.Its just like your run of the mill action film everyone seen it.
If they werent interested in realistic miltiary, then they would have played killzone 2 or Team fortress, but no oh they choose MW2 for its realistic picture, where you die by very few shots and the tempo is very high and you have always to be careful. it shows how war is IRL
[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"]I've played U2 on a full-HD 50 TV, and while it's an inspiring and one-of-a-kind adventure, the graphics are overratted and pretty muc hsucknavyguy21
Overrated?? Perhaps. Pretty much suck?? Ok, now youre just trolling lol I remember when i first bought the game. I was floored by the graphics, especially in the village. But i can agree that they are over hyped by cows. But its still the best looking console game to date, followed by Gears 2 imo Killzone 2 looks a lot better, it isn't full of jaggies which uncharted 2 is. and then it isn't a huge opened world like Crysis, which makes the graphics less impressive. anyway, anyon claiming U2 is console graphics king is trolling imo
[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"][QUOTE="toast_burner"] 2.3 million soldiers>>>>>>8 million untrained civilianstoast_burner
Untrained civilians? you don't happen to back up that statement of yours with some facts, do u .. ? playing a video game is not military training and thats a fact But those playing MW2 are those with special interests in the subject military, and handling weapons, shooting, and so on.
[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"]I've played U2 on a full-HD 50 TV, and while it's an inspiring and one-of-a-kind adventure, the graphics are overratted and pretty muc hsuckrazgriz_101
but i bet Modern warfare 2 breaks every boundary possible and is the best looking game even tho its a tarted up CoD 4...
No, crysis, then Killzone 2. U2 is below call of duty in terms of technical graphics
[QUOTE="PRT-CCM"][QUOTE="blaaah"]If you're going to declare war on a country, atleast make sure you have the right one...toast_burner
China is nothing with their 2.3 million soldiers, they're only ONE nation, uses ONE tactic. Nothing compared to 8 million soldiers from around the world, all with different countries, different tactics and strategies, would tear down the Chinese pretty easy. I laugh at people saying China is the biggest military power in the world, or Russia, or USA. As for now, it's the Modern Warfare 2 Army. 2.3 million soldiers>>>>>>8 million untrained civilians Untrained civilians? you don't happen to back up that statement of yours with some facts, do u .. ? Im one of thos ethat play MW2, and I can perfectly handle a weapon and kil la man, and with some help from 7,999,999 others, we can destroy the military of China
Log in to comment