[QUOTE="Koalakommander"][QUOTE="flintgijoe"][QUOTE="Koalakommander"][QUOTE="iunderstand"]flintgijoe
The first sentence buddy. The first sentence..
I admire your attempt on trying to disect my disscection -- but you fail and here's why:
I am not a paid professional, I'm just some guy with an opinion like I stated in the beginning.
The point is that you take stuff out of context when you disect like that. Whether or not the author is paid is irrelevent.
Reviews are opinions. Aaron is paid to give his opinion on games. Thats all. He wasn't blown away by Ratchet and Clank. If you want to know why, you can read the review, where he states his reasons clearly. 7.5 is his Opinion. He thought the game was good, not great.
You seem to think that sense the GS team is paid, their opinions should magically fall in line with the review average of sites like metacritic, or else the are wrong. Like your above post, reviews are just opinions. There is nothing wrong with Aaron's review.
He isn't saying they should be inline with the average, rather, the article should clearly show why it received that score and not contradict itself so much. Whether or not he gave it a good score was irrelevant, his writing didn't make sense as to why it got a 7.5
Log in to comment