Plzhelpmelearn's forum posts

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

You must know full well that 1 John 5:7 (the only scripture that explicitly states the trinitarian formula) is not in any of the most reliable manuscripts of the bible and is a later insertion...

blackregiment

Those that subscribe to the corrupt Alexandrian mauscripts believe that but that is not the case.

http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/vindicationof.htm

http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/authenticityof.htm

Yu didn't answer my question. Do you believe Jesus is God?

I don't believe in the Judeo Christian God anymore. When I did, however, I did believe Jesus was God yes. Not a "person" of God but God.
Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

A basic principle of Biblical interpretation is that we must let Scripture interpret Scripture in light of the whole counsel of God's Word. You continue to resist this. That is your choice but if you study the rules of Biblical Scripture, you will find that this doctrine is accepted by virtually all theologians and Biblical scholars.

I am not too concerned with who believes scripture should interpret scripture. The question then becomes what sciptures interpret which scriptures? I agree that you have to take a consensus

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]3. No the thief died under the old covenant while the revelation of Holy Spirit and baptism in Jesus name are the new covenant which was established on the day of Pentecost.blackregiment

So are you saying Jesus did not know what He was talking about when He said that to the thief?

No, Jesus knew that they were under the old covenant, thus that man did go to heaven. The new covenant would not begin until the day of pentecost. Try and use a little critical thinking here please I explicitly stated this already.

Thus I stand by the fact that if you have not spoken in tongues you are not saved. Read Acts 2, 10, and 19 for further proof.Plzhelpmelearn

A discussion of speaking in tongues is beyond the scope of this thread so I am not going to get into a discussion of that, no matter how hard you try to change the subject. I will say however, that speaking in tongues, as occurred in Biblical times, was speaking in a known language, understood by those hearing it, not the random, unintelligible, mumblings as practiced in some Churches today.

The following articles address "speaking in tongues" in detail from a Biblical perspective.

http://www.speaking-in-tongues.net/about.html

http://www.gotquestions.org/tongues-Holy-Spirit.html

These articles have a clear bias against speaking in tongues. Anytime someone is saved in the book of Acts it is either clear or implied (as in samaria) that it occured. Paul in Acts 19 explicitly states "Have you received the Holy Ghost since you believed" this obviously creates a separation between believing and receiving the Holy Ghost which happened SURPRISE after they spoke in tongues.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

You must know full well that 1 John 5:7 (the only scripture that explicitly states the trinitarian formula) is not in any of the most reliable manuscripts of the bible and is a later insertion...

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

The fact that "persons" is incompatible with one. There is no mention of the trinity in the Bible (well there is one verse that has been proven to have been added after the original writings), but countless scriptures referring to God's oneness. You can say what you want about Jesus' conversations with the father in the gospels (and they certainly are strange, but the Godhead is ultimately one person (see Colossians 2:9). His being is not some magical illogical mystery.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

Thanks but I am a Biblical Christian. I don't subscribe to mysticism or New Age beliefs.

blackregiment

Well atleast you are honest, and always your very welcome, I do not reject any information, and I love to share, though I find it ironic a biblical christian, saying he/she does not subscribe to mysticism.

Let me clarify. There is a difference between mysticism as a theology and mysteries, things we are unable to understand with our finite minds, such as the Triune Godhead. As a Biblical Christian, I believe that Scripture is the inspired, inerrant, preserved Word of God and is sufficient. God has revealed, in His Word, what we need to know until Jesus returns. There is an old adage that references the Bible. Basic Instruction Before Leaving Earth. There will always be things we do not fully understand until the Lord returns. That being said, God has revealed hat we need to know to prepare us for eternity.

2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2Ti 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

The Triune godhead is a heresy

"Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [echad]!" Deuteronomy 6:4 "Yahweh is God; there is no one else."

1 Kings 8:60 "I and the Father are one [hen]."

John 10:30 "I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God."

Isaiah 45:5 "This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only [monos] true God" John 17:3

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

You are forgetting that the Bible is addresses to the body of believers and that Scripture builds on Scripture. Scripture makes it very clear who are the sheep and who are the goats. You continue to want to take verses out of context and ignore the whole counsel of God's Word. I do not accept that premise.

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]I can do it all day long. Watch me. blackregiment

I am sure you can. Humanity has been doing that since the Garden of Eden when that famous question was first posed, "Yea hath God said?"

Psa 118:8 Itis better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.

Acts 2:38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit..

Baptism must be being born of the water. Receiving the holy spirit is being born of the spirit. Thus everyone who is not baptized in Jesus name and has not spoken in tongues (as in Acts 2) will BURN.

Born of water is natural birth. Born of the spirit is being reborn, a new creature in Christ. Water baptism is an announcement to the body of believers that one has accepted Christ as their lord and Savior and intends to follow Christ. Are you suggesting that Jesus lied when Jesus told the thief on the cross that he would be with Him in paradise that day? When was the thief baptized with water?

Luk 23:39 And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on him, saying, If thou be Christ, save thyself and us.

Luk 23:40 But the other answering rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?

Luk 23:41 And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss.

Luk 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.

Luk 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.

What!?!? okay...

1. None of those verses you supplied say anything about what is required on our part for salvation. I know that Jesus is the means of salvation that does not mean that Jesus can't save anyone He wants. Even if you quote Paul talking to the Phillipian jailer, that is not necessarily indicating that everyone who is saved must confess Jesus Christ is Lord, only that doing so would in fact save the jailer.

2. I specifically said that scriptures MUST be interpreted in context. I am accusing you of taking scripture out of context when you try to interpret verses in Matthew with verses in other books of the Bible. Also, when you use the notion of "God's whole counsel" you are only saying "what I claim God's whole counsel is". Gods counsel is based on scripture and if you are using certain scriptures to interpret other scriptures who is to say it can't be the other way around? I can interpret the whole Bible based on my view that Matthew 25 is saying that doing good works for the least of people is necessary for salvation and make everything else secondary. Would that be any different than what you are doing?

3. No the thief died under the old covenant while the revelation of Holy Spirit and baptism in Jesus name are the new covenant which was established on the day of Pentecost. Thus I stand by the fact that if you have not spoken in tongues you are not saved. Read Acts 2, 10, and 19 for further proof.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

BlackRegiment:

While I understand your point on salvation and God's work to bring about salvation for all humanity. I think you need to be very careful about answering questions about who is and is not ultimately going to heaven and hell. The apostles preached the gospel but i can't recall a specific occasion where they condemned a specific individual to hell. Jesus especially made it a point to say that we are not to judge. There are also controversial scriptures like Matthew 25:31–46 that seem to point to salvation for others who do not know Jesus. Preach what you believe is the truth, but I don't think you have biblical authority to make definite statements about who will and will not be in hell. Maybe you are not doing this, and please correct me if I am misunderstanding you. Thanks!

blackregiment

That's a pretty fancy straw man you have created. I do find it ironic that is crafting that straw man regarding "judging individuals" your must resort to "judging what I have written" to attempt to accuse me of something I have not done. Often the old, "judge not defense" can backfire. That is why it is so vital to undersand the doctrine of Biblical judgement. I have not made any statement regarding "who is and who is not ultimately going to Heaven or hell". I have not "condemned a specific individual to hell". Please refrain from accusing me of doing things I have not done. I have simply presented what God's Word reveals on the matter. By the way, they are God's Words, not mine. As far as individuals, no one can know the heart of another person or their personal relationship with Jesus Christ, only the Lord knows this. Are you suggesting that the Word of God does not plainly reveal His plan of salvation?

Sharing what God has revealed regarding His plan of salvation in Christ is not "judging", it is sharing the Gospel of salvation in Christ as Christians are commanded to do.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Mat 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

Matthew 25:31-46 is not controversial at all. Scripture is very clear regarding the distinction between who are sheep and who are goats when one studies them in light of the whole councel of the Word of God, in the proper context, rather that taken out of context of the whole counsel of God's Word. A basic principle of Biblical interpretation is that when we encounter verses that are difficult or that appear to teach something other that the whole counsel of God's Word, we must interpret them in light of the whole counsel of God's Word. We must let Scripture interpret Scripture, not let our feelings and desires interpret Scripture.

Act 20:27 For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God.

Scripture is very clear on who are God's sheep, His adopted children, His body of true believers that will have eternal fellowship with Him. We many not like it but we cannot change it and impose our own desires on the Lord. Our beliefs do not determine reality, rather we must insure that our beliefs conform to the reality of God's revealed truth.

Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Joh 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

1Jn 5:11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
1Jn 5:12 He that hath the Son hath life: and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
1Jn 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

Act 4:10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
Act 4:11 This is the stone which was set at naught of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
Act 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

Rom 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Rom 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

okay a couple things...

I was not trying to create any kind of straw man, if you were not intending to judge then so be it. The question of salvation is not just a question of the means of salvation (which is obviously Jesus Christ) but also how one is able to achieve that salvation on a personal basis. While the Bible certainly lays out things that can bring about salvation it never explicitly claims those things as the only way to achieve salvation.

I disagree with your view of Biblical interpretation. You claim that I let my feelings and desire interpret scripture, I'm accusing you of letting your bias and previous understanding of scripture interpret the rest of scripture for you. A scriptures interpretation is based on its given context. It is not based on the "whole counsel of God's Word" as you claim. To me that means nothing more than "I have already decided God's view (or counsel) on certain topics so I will interpret all of scripture to confirm all my current biases."

If you lay down your view of the "whole counsel of God's word" and look at the passage in Matthew 25 in its own context you will see that it explicitly states "all nations" as being gathered together. It goes on to to claims that the only distinction made between the sheep and the goats is the sheep have helped "the least of these" and thus their works have been accounted as being done for Jesus. Even more interesting is that the sheep have no idea that they have been working for Jesus, which lends to the fact that they were probably not Christians. You can try and interpret Matthew by using verses in Romans all day long, but ultimately that is not respecting the fact that they are completely different pieces of literature written for different purposes. You will probably claim that God is the author, but that is still no excuse to be an ignorant interpreter connecting dots all over different passages of scripture that were written at different times to different people for different purposes.

I can do it all day long. Watch me.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.

Acts 2:38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit..

Baptism must be being born of the water. Receiving the holy spirit is being born of the spirit. Thus everyone who is not baptized in Jesus name and has not spoken in tongues (as in Acts 2) will BURN.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

My dad make me feel worthless all the time and I have no idea on how to clue him in on what a huge ******* he's being. I just spent the last half hour or so crying. Right now, I can't stop shaking. Moving out isn't an option although tomorrow I can spend a few hours away from the house at the very least. Help me please. I don't know what to do.

zeorshadow19

I can relate to you. If he is anything like my old man, then there is probably little you can do to try and change him. Just know a couple things.

1) He is saying those things to hurt you. Not to try to help you and not because they are true.

2) It is ultimately your choice of how much you let it destroy your self esteem

3) As long as you are under his roof you must either learn to ignore it or face this situation over and over

4) I personally had to move out to escape my dad's constant barrage of insults and attempts to control me.

5) I understand that he is your father and it is natural want to make him proud, but understand that your dad has his own emotional problems and issues that is causing him to disrespect you and treat you this way. He is wrong and you have to talk to him about it and ultimately decide if it is worth putting up with.

you said moving out is not an option, but honestly at your age it probably is an option, though maybe a difficult or far-fetched one. I am 23 and moved out at 18. It has taken me longer to get my education, and not been easy financially, but despite the difficulties I am much happier being free from that abuse.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]

The EU is trying to mount pressure on israel to lift the blockade on Gaza. It is this same mindset that led Obama to foolishly declare that he would have Guantanamo Bay shut down within a year and now we are approaching two with nothing done. Until you understand why a situation is the way it is, then you have no hope of changing it. Danm_999

Are you seriously accusing Europe of being unaware of what created the Israeli-Palestinian tensions?

Well, while I am sure that they are intellectually aware of the delicacy of the situation and the history of events leading up to it, i think they are at least guilty of using tunnel vision in pretending like lifting the Israeli blockade is going to solve anything. It seems more like a knee jerk response rather than a thought out solution to try and prevent things like this from happening in the future. In fact, as I stated, i think it will probably make it worse.
Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

That's pretty messed up, but honestly, if he has a halfway competent press office, they can make that into a total win. Look how much guff Obama got for having a measured, unemotional response to BP, after all.xaos
haha I can see it now.... He did not mean to aggressively assault the boys, but he was just so ANGRY over partisan politics, high taxes, and the BP oil spill that it bubbled over. He didn't see college students for that moment, he only saw the national debt and frivolous spending.