Poop_Slash's forum posts

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

For the past 2 years nothing they did seems to make anysense.

Fricking Mad with Power with there PS2....

Is the PS3 ever going to sell?

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

"OMG LIEK, I BELIEVE IT! LAWL, ITZ TEH SONY. SONY DID IT!"

Nevermind the fact that the clown recording it is laughing and the fact that no other Blockbuster (or game store in general for that matter) has a Halo 3 trailer running on the PS3, ITZ TEH REAL.

I like my 360 but for the love of God, anyone who actually believes this should get their head checked.

SergeantSnitch

With all the Crazy **** Sony has done over the past 2 and a half years.

This is not surprising.

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

It's not a failure. Anyone who says otherwise is wrong.

donnygorgas

What about being dead last and all the Dog Crap Flop games?

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

Good God it never stops, does it?

Lair could have been an amazing game if Sony only backed off on the Motion controls a bit.

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

It is ALWAYS the exact same thing- graphics are slightly worse on the PS3 version than the 360 version. There are slight graphical hangups on the PS3 version that the 360 version does not have. It might run smoother on the 360. Sound and presentation is exactly the same. Controls are better on the 360 version. The PS3 version lacks a couple online features that the 360 version has, but otherwise it's roughly the same, with the 360 version getting the better online designation. Basically, the PS3 version will be .2-.5 points lower than whatever the 360 version's score is. So why do they even waste our time reviewing PS3 multiplatform games? The 360 version is pretty much always the superior version, and gamers pretty much acknowledge this as the law now.accameron

Nope sometimes or most of the time Sound and presentation also SUCK.:(

Not enough Rams for a High Bitrate to the sound files I guess.

Wow PS3 sucks the big one... :lol:

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts
[QUOTE="Poop_Slash"]

Warhawk is not as groundbreaking as the cows led you to believe it to be.

I remember Crimson Skies to be infinitely more fun on XBL 5 years back then

Warhawk.

Warhawk like very PS3 game Lacks, SOUL.

NeoGen85

Well. I think Warhawk being a online only is reason toreceive further developer attention. That's good. But I am waiting for another Crimson Skies to hit the Xbox 360. I almost bought a PS3 for Warhawk the week before, but I just decided to get a Xbox 360.

Good Man. 8)

I would throw myself off a bridge if I brought a PS3 for Warhawk... :P

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

Good God....:x

Sony What Next? :x

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts
[QUOTE="Poop_Slash"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]No Warhawk? You need to break down and get it, Granted one game can't make up for what a joke the PS3 has been so far but wow, what a great title, a little pricey but it did get me to knock the dust off the sixaxis.Sir-Marwin105

Good God... It's 39.99$ for the Download.... :(

But I rented it, Played it for maybe an hour.

It was the same as the Beta but with more polished Graphics.

I remember myself saying. Crimson Skies Did this 5 years ago on XBL and it did it better.

And I wasn't impressed with the Graphics a Bit.

SO YOU HAVE TURNED IT ON!!!!:o

Uh-oh.... tee hee :roll::x

Just to check out What is up with Warhawk.... Didn't like it that much, after about an hour

Turned it back off. :x

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

Warhawk is not as groundbreaking as the cows led you to believe it to be.

I remember Crimson Skies to be infinitely more fun on XBL 5 years back then

Warhawk.

Warhawk like very PS3 game Lacks, SOUL.

Avatar image for Poop_Slash
Poop_Slash

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Poop_Slash
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts

No Warhawk? You need to break down and get it, Granted one game can't make up for what a joke the PS3 has been so far but wow, what a great title, a little pricey but it did get me to knock the dust off the sixaxis.Riverwolf007

Good God... It's 39.99$ for the Download.... :(

But I rented it, Played it for maybe an hour.

It was the same as the Beta but with more polished Graphics.

I remember myself saying. Crimson Skies Did this 5 years ago on XBL and it did it better.

And I wasn't impressed with the Graphics a Bit.