The sales argument is basically more sales = better games on that system, however I see little evidence of this. The Wii has sold what 40 mil, yet its not exactly swimming in AAA titles and certainly is not pwning the 360 and PS3 in terms of games.
The same can be said 360 vs PS3: infact it could be argued that with all the upcoming titles in the next year the PS3 is infact ahead in terms of games although it lags behind in sales.
In conclusion, unless I have overlooked a key point I would argue that the sales argument is not relevent.
Thoughts?
i think they do matter, more sales= more dev interest, and you can't say the ps3 has it in the bag for games this year, that's an opinion, and MS have not yet announced all there games for this year, it's way to early to say who's going to win in terms of games. the bottom line is Devs make more money on the console which is selling the most and a lot of devs are pulling ou from making there games on the ps3 or are releasing there titles later on the ps3, because games don't sell enough on the ps3 to justify the development recources/costs, basically more console sales = more game sales=more profit for developers=more games made on that platform thats all fine and dandy but can you prove it?
[QUOTE="Poster_11"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Perhaos you should tell various professors of Physics that there is no such thing as time travel who are trying and testing time travel in their laboratories. There is time travel in a sense. The closer you get to a massive object the slower time will go. The universe outside of that massive object will seem to go faster and faster the closer you get. Giving of course you are able to get away from that massive object and back out into space where there is no gravity more time will have passed for the universe you are in than yourself.Shad0ki11
well yes but thats also go's around the idea of a black hole they have not proved a black hole yet its still a theory and with the theory time once in it doesnt not exist because of the massive pull of gravity but this stuff is still all theoretical
The effects of black holes have been observed, which is evidence that supports the existence of black holes.
I'm not saying they dont exsist and like you said they have evidence to support it but it's still a theory none the less.
and a lot of pc games are being pawned off to the broken steam *took them 2 years to fix freinds list lawl and it worked better befor they updated it too!*
[QUOTE="Poster_11"]Time it self is a idea not a thing thats why you cannot time travel because it was a idea made to keep track of things and make life more organized so time itself does exist but not as a thing but just as an idea.BumFluff122
Perhaos you should tell various professors of Physics that there is no such thing as time travel who are trying and testing time travel in their laboratories. There is time travel in a sense. The closer you get to a massive object the slower time will go. The universe outside of that massive object will seem to go faster and faster the closer you get. Giving of course you are able to get away from that massive object and back out into space where there is no gravity more time will have passed for the universe you are in than yourself. well yes but thats also go's around the idea of a black hole they have not proved a black hole yet its still a theory and with the theory time once in it doesnt not exist because of the massive pull of gravity but this stuff is still all theoretical
The only reason religious people get mad when you talk about evolution is because "god" supposedly made man in his image and people dont want to believe that their ancestors way way back were monkeys lol....
and just so you know were i stand on religion i only have on thing to say when god pops out of the bushes and slaps me in the face then i will bleave in him or it.
Log in to comment