It's in the field of science so yes. Science is mankinds greatest weapon and allie and thus funding for these type of programs should be a priority.
QuebecNationale's forum posts
[QUOTE="QuebecNationale"]Jesus Christ, you can't be serious. 1) There's no evidence that the cops that he's killed have actually been guilty of corruption. 2) Apparently it's almost certain that at least two of the people he's killed weren't even cops. They just happened to be unlucky enough to know a cop who Dorner hated. 3) The penalty for "corruption" is not death. Any judge who hands out the death penalty for "corruption" is gonna see that sentence quickly removed. So...if it's not okay for our criminal justice system to hand out death as a penalty for corruption, then why is it okay for Dorner to do that? 4) Your whole argument basically boils down to saying that the people who Dorner killed were scumbags, so it's acceptable or even good for him to kill those people. Is that the standard that you want to live by? Because that's the same standard that results in cops abusing their power. By pretty much all accounts, Rodney King actually WAS a scumbag. Does that justify the beating that he got? Would it have justified a cop skipping the beating entirely and blowing king's head off just because he's a piece of $***. Well...you're implicitly condoning those sort of actions from the police by supporting Dorner. Because it all stems from the same thing. Know a few dirty cops, assume that all cops are the same person, and therefore equally dirty, therefore it's okay to kill any cop. That's the EXACT same mentality that results in corruption by the police. Stuff like hassling people for "driving while black", forcing confessions, using excessive force: ALL of that $*** springs from the exact same mentality you're talking about. 5) Your polar thinking is also evident of a small mind. You think that people have to support the cops or Dorner in this situation, which is bull$***, and you're using people's condemnations of Dorner to assume that they must support the cops. WRONG. People can also support both the cops AND Dorner, people can also support NEITHER the cops nor Dorner.No, Dorner is killing corruption so he's not murdering people. For the sake of argument though, let's say if Dorner did murder people; he's killing corrupt cop's who exploited their community and broke several laws, so I don't see a problem. It's really amusing how much of a hypocrit you are. You support cop's who have a shiny badge killing and shooting civillians, soldiers killing civillians over seas yet when an ex LAPD officer kills corrupt cop's, you persecute him? The ignorance.
MrGeezer
1) Yes, there is evidence as explained by Dorner. Did you not read his manifesto? He's an ex LAPD officer so he actually knows what he's talking about. He clearly stated the rampant corruption, and you're forgetting that the police officer in Riverside was protecting a corrupt cop, so therefor he supported corruption.
2)Like I said earlier, while civillians caught in the crossfire is unfortunate, they're collateral damage as the military would say. When one fights corruption, the deaths of civillians are inevitable.
3) The penalty for corruption IS death or it should be at least. You're forgetting that these corrupt cop's have nothing but disdain for the world; they don't care about the protect and serve part of policing, but rather the power and authority it brings, which ends up with them breaking the law, killing civillians and getting a slap on thw wrist or a paid vacation.
Â
The cop's are against Dorner and thus they're against justice. It's not a hard conept for you to understand. Dorner went through the legal channels AKA the Chief of Police and got fired and outcasted. He had no choice but to do this in order to reveal the corruption in the LAPD. Tell me, do you support the LAPD? Do you support corrupt cop's? It seems like you do. I'm condoning justice, not murder as most of you like to claim, and yes you can choose a clear side in this; either you support the LAPD and the corrupt cop's or you support justice(Dorner). Cop's wouldn't abuse their power if people started questioning their Police department. This thread is evident that people love to blindly worship corrupt cop's and Police agencies.
Haha ...Pierre Trudeau will be reborn and kick Quebec's ass again....[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="Apathetic_Prick"]
If anything can unite Canada, it's the thinly veiled racism of the Quebec separatists. If those idiots built a wall around their "nation", the rest of the country would happily flood it with the waters from all three oceans. And then we'd all go back to hating Alberta. Zing!
Apathetic_Prick
Quebec doesn't need its ass kicked, it never did. The English already did that at the plains of Abraham while they were still actually speaking French. What Quebec needs is a new outlook. Most Quebecois don't want to separate - that guy was trying to represent a minority of elitist jerkwads who think they're better than the rest of the country, yet the captains of industry are mostly everywhere BUT Quebec.Â
Sure, we've had lots of leaders from there, but most of them weren't...very good. That said, we don't need another Trudeau; going back in the past is never a good thing. While we certainly need to restore everything that he did that Harper deliberately undid because the Reform Party didn't do it first (nor would have thought of it), saying we need someone who's desperate to get Canada on the world's stage and reunite it is absolutely asinine.
Oh, and QuebecNational, Quebec is a dependant "have" province (which makes no sense at all, but they get more tansfer payments than the Maritimes, who actually need that money). The only reason why your province is being led by separatists is because Jean Charest screwed up so much and the NDP bamboozled you (which is justifiable). Separatism is dead unless you're one of the few remaining bigots who truly believe it. I guess we know where you stand.
Â
Lol, the English were destroyed by France since France won most battles against the British Empire. Realistically, Canada should be owned by France and we should all be speaking French. Also, you're wrong about most Quebecois don't want to seperate; most Quebecois do because the English Government is trying to destroy French culture in Quebec.
Also, Quebec hasn't recieved the most in transfer payments aside from the upcoming 2014. Quebec is wealthier than all of the Canadian provinces combined so what you're saying is false.
Quebec shall be victorious against the English in time. Most of the Canadian military bases are located in Quebec so basically we own the Canadian Army. If we decided to invade Canada, they couldn't do a damn thing and the English Canadians will have to swear loyalty to Quebec.
Being fired for lying?[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Leejjohno"]
Who wouldn't have mental issues after being treated like that?
Leejjohno
Yes, if he percieved everybody as corrupt and conspiring against him I can imagine that causing considerable distress.Â
It doesn't look that way from where I am sitting. The information he posted just seems too consistent for your usual *just looking for an excuse to fight the man and top myself when the cops show up* format. And lets face it... it's not like LAPD has the prettiest track record.
My gut just tells me that there's no smoke without fire and they just happened to screw with the wrong guy this time.
I wouldn't bother arguing with LJ. He thinks the LAPD can do no wrong and that all of Dorner's claims were false. Even if the LAPD shot a civillian in the middle of a street, LJ would probably defend the LAPD since he loves corrupt organisations so much.
Lol, the LAPD and SWAT are completetly inept. They have drones, more than 100 men at their disposal but they can't kill one man? I'm glad he survived.
So far he has not been found in the other cabins, now only the search in the one on fire is left. LAST CHANCE for bets people. Dead or Alive? There are no jiggle physics with this one either, this is a serious situation.StaticOnTV
Â
I think he's alive. He's an ex LAPD officer so he has the training to know what the LAPD would do in any given situation.
Â
If he is dead then R.I.P anti-corruption hero.
[QUOTE="Chow_Mein_Kampf"][QUOTE="QuebecNationale"]
From the years that I lurked here I would say thegerg, LJ, Shadowmoses900, brucewayne, Airshocker, pirate800, banjo and finalstar2007(Or something like that) are all tied for first.
chessmaster1989
Pirate's aight...................
No he said Pirate800 that's the evil twin of Pirate700.That's a typo on my part I believe. I'm talking about the Pirate*insert numbers here* guy who has a star wars sig.
From the years that I lurked here I would say thegerg, LJ, Shadowmoses900, brucewayne, Airshocker, pirate800, banjo and finalstar2007(Or something like that) are all tied for first.
[QUOTE="QuebecNationale"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Dorner is murdering people. There is no argument on that. LJS9502_basic
No, Dorner is killing corruption so he's not murdering people. For the sake of argument though, let's say if Dorner did murder people; he's killing corrupt cop's who exploited their community and broke several laws, so I don't see a problem. It's really amusing how much of a hypocrit you are. You support cop's who have a shiny badge killing and shooting civillians, soldiers killing civillians over seas yet when an ex LAPD officer kills corrupt cop's, you persecute him? The ignorance.
You might want to learn what words mean before you use them......and frankly....you have ZERO evidence he's killing corrupt cops....and that doesn't account for the civilians. You are either the biggest troll or a complete psychopath....either way....you don't make for good conversation.I know the definitions of the words I use. No, there is evidence that the cop's he killed were corrupt but that evidence is in the hands of the Chief of Police. Besides, these cop's support corruption since they did nothing to help Dorner or combat corruption itself. Dorner spoke out against the corruption of the LAPD and his life was ruined by the Chief of Police and the media; he was the only officer in the LAPD who didn't stand for corruption.
Well, that's your opinion and frankly your opinion means nothing to me. You're a hypocrit and you support the LAPD so I couldn't care less about what you think.
Log in to comment