QuebecNationale's forum posts

Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
This is good news. I hate it when Americans go into other countries to conduct espionage against a country that has a relatively small military.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
I prefer CS 1.6 over both but I'll take Global Offensive over Counter Strike: Source any day.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts

[QUOTE="QuebecNationale"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="QuebecNationale"]Well, it looks like i'm not going to buy this game. At least my wallet will sleep a bit easier. It's actually amazing how EA has managed to ruin so many franchises in the past 5 or so years.megadeth1117

Your loss if actually wanted the game before this. Game isn't ruined because of optional weapons packs that you can still find yourself.

This micro transaction scheme is a disgrace to gaming, and people shouldn't be supporting this. If you buy this game then you're supporting the nickle and diming of customers and telling EA that it's okay to include micro transactions in games(It's not okay FYI). .

Again, EA deals in video games, not human trafficking. They have no obligation, legal or moral, to "play by the rules". If they want to charge for a few cosmetic items, so be it. 

That may be, but It's still an immoral business practise that shouldn't be supported. If people buy Dead Space 3, they're saying It's ok for these kind of shady micro transaction schemes to continue. I'm going to take the moral high ground and not buy Dead Space 3.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
Both playstation and xbox are dying. The only viable platform is PC simply because it has the best games, you can use it for just about anything and sitting on a nice comfy computer chair is much better than sitting on a couch. Xbox is dying faster though simply because it lacks any good games for the most part. I was at a friends house about 2 weeks ago and playing on the Xbox and PS3 was almost unbearable, and there are absolutely no games that interest me. I was going to buy an Xbox a few years ago simply because of Gears of War, but that released on PC a year later, so buying an Xbox360 was nothing more than waste of money.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
[QUOTE="hexashadow13"][QUOTE="QuebecNationale"][QUOTE="hexashadow13"] And do you have any evidence to support that claim?

I have common sense and logic as evidence. Just think about it for a second. The War on terror/Afghanistan is a perfect example of how violence can sensualised and seen as normal to the average citizen. Do you remember when Americans in droves cried over the loss of a US soldier? What happened when the casualties rose in greater numbers? People didn't start to care what happened to the soldiers, nor did people care what war crimes their soldiers committed. Mass violence via invasion of a foreign country made violence an everyday occurrence, in which people didn't care. Did Americans care when Gadaffi's body was dragged through the streets of Libya? No, because your average American viewed it as fine and acceptable, which is what I think the news anchor was trying to get at. Video games do exactly that, they visualise extreme violence, and I personally think that video games play a part in why Americans view savage like violence as normal and just.

So you would expect gun violence to go up with the rise of violent video games, but that is hardly the case. Gun violence has been going down for quite a while, and video games have had absolutely no noticeable statistical effect on that.  From =: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-about-guns-and-mass-shootings-in-the-united-states/ The rise of violent video games started about mid 1990s with Doom and all that and has ramped up since then. Does it look like that had any effect whatsoever on that curve? Violent video games may be the tipping point that leads insane people to do insane things, but they're insane so nothing is going to work in regards to them other than improved mental health infrastructure. America has always been a violent nation. That's just who we have been, and will most likely continue to be. Finding the events you mentioned perfectly acceptable would be the case if video games had or had never existed in the first place.

Actually, gun violence has increased in the US over the years, and I'm also not sure why you're bringing guns into this when this is about video games, and how violent, savage behaviour is becoming more accepted each day. Also, the Virginia Tech shooter played violent video games, so there's proof that violence in video games factor in to real life violence. I don't think you fully understood my post; I didn't say violent video games are solely to blame for people perceiving savage violence as normal, but they do play a part in the grand scheme of things, which is what I think the CNN reporter was trying to get at; she's criticising the fact that video games have basically shown people that violence is good and acceptable, which shouldn't be the case in a normal and functioning society. This is all further enforced by the fact that most Americans were celebrating Gadaffi getting dragged through the streets of Libya. Such barbaric behaviour shouldn't be condoned but violent video games are playing a factor in this, and telling people that violence is acceptable. Also, I find it amusing that you justify extreme violence simply because "America has always been a violent nation". That kind of thinking is what leads to genocides, massacres and events that could otherwise be avoided.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
[QUOTE="hexashadow13"][QUOTE="QuebecNationale"]That was unprofessional of David Jaffe to call her and idiot mainly because I think she has a point there. While GTA doesn't reward you for killing innocents, violence in video games can be directly related to violent incidents in real life simply because video games sensualise violence. The more kids/adults see violence in video games, the more they will see it as "normal/right", and those people could eventually end up as serial killers who see's violence as right and justified, even if their violence is directed at innocent civilians. Keep in mind, I don't agree with everything the news anchor said, and I think she needs to re evaluate her comments, but that also doesn't mean she's necessarily wrong.

And do you have any evidence to support that claim?

I have common sense and logic as evidence. Just think about it for a second. The War on terror/Afghanistan is a perfect example of how violence can sensualised and seen as normal to the average citizen. Do you remember when Americans in droves cried over the loss of a US soldier? What happened when the casualties rose in greater numbers? People didn't start to care what happened to the soldiers, nor did people care what war crimes their soldiers committed. Mass violence via invasion of a foreign country made violence an everyday occurrence, in which people didn't care. Did Americans care when Gadaffi's body was dragged through the streets of Libya? No, because your average American viewed it as fine and acceptable, which is what I think the news anchor was trying to get at. Video games do exactly that, they visualise extreme violence, and I personally think that video games play a part in why Americans view savage like violence as normal and just.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts

[QUOTE="QuebecNationale"]Well, it looks like i'm not going to buy this game. At least my wallet will sleep a bit easier. It's actually amazing how EA has managed to ruin so many franchises in the past 5 or so years.StrongBlackVine

Your loss if actually wanted the game before this. Game isn't ruined because of optional weapons packs that you can still find yourself.

No, the game is ruined because of several reasons but the micro transactions are a fraction of the reason as to why the Dead Space franchise is ruined. This micro transaction scheme is a disgrace to gaming, and people shouldn't be supporting this. If you buy this game then you're supporting the nickle and diming of customers and telling EA that it's okay to include micro transactions in games(It's not okay FYI). This is nothing more than a cash grab by major corporations, and anyone who doesn't want this trend to continue shouldn't buy any of EA's games.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
That was unprofessional of David Jaffe to call her and idiot mainly because I think she has a point there. While GTA doesn't reward you for killing innocents, violence in video games can be directly related to violent incidents in real life simply because video games sensualise violence. The more kids/adults see violence in video games, the more they will see it as "normal/right", and those people could eventually end up as serial killers who see's violence as right and justified, even if their violence is directed at innocent civilians. Keep in mind, I don't agree with everything the news anchor said, and I think she needs to re evaluate her comments, but that also doesn't mean she's necessarily wrong.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
I hate the Bioshock games so I'm not going to be buying Bioshock Infinite. The new one also looks too "Americanised" and the game will basically pander to Americans ,and state how they're the greatest country in the world when they're not. Company of Heroes 2 and Rome 2 Total War....now those are games I'm excited for.
Avatar image for QuebecNationale
QuebecNationale

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 QuebecNationale
Member since 2013 • 146 Posts
Well, it looks like i'm not going to buy this game. At least my wallet will sleep a bit easier. It's actually amazing how EA has managed to ruin so many franchises in the past 5 or so years.