Oh great, another game using the BF acronym!

In order mine are:

1. Mass Effect: The next great rpg from Bioware.  Need I say more?

2. Gears of War 2:  A sequel is inevitable.

3. Final Fantasy 13

4. Halo 3

5. Super Mario Galaxy

I hear that the new downloadable maps in the game (which they are currently charging for) will become free at some point.  Is this true?  And when will this be?

This is the team of the future out west.  Oden, Roy (rookie of the year), Aldridge (all NBA rookie 1st team).. that is a core that you can build on.  And the summer has just started, more deals to come :)PopeReal

Hey, the spurs have won 3 championships (about to be 4 soon), and some people still refuse to call them a dynasty. So I think it's a little early to call the blazers one.

Spurs play fundamental basketball? yeah sure...if you mean dirty play. Gimme a break Bruce Bowen is dirty as any player i've ever seen. But it seems like its gonna happen.whodeysay85

And yet there are 29 other coaches who would gladly put Bowen on their roster.

Lot of talk going around that the Spurs will wrap up their 4th championship since 1999 and should be considered a dynasty along with the 90s Bulls, and 80s Lakers and Celtics. Im not buying it.

 

First championship has an asterick by it because it was a shortened season b/c of the lock-out so no one really counts that one.

Lakers won 3 straight championships to start the 21st century. I consider them more of a dynasty than the Spurs.

Spurs have never won back-to-back titles. Not a requirement to be considered a dynasty but it helps.

They haven't won their 4th title yet. Utah will give them a fight, and if Detroit makes it to the Finals, expect a 7 game series that could go either way.

 

Win the title this year and maybe another one this decade, then the Spurs will be a dynasty. As of right now, they are a great organization, not a dynasty.

Agree? 

 

d12malu

I have many problems with what you are saying.

Problem #1: So what if it was a lockout shortened season?  Every ****ing team played 50 games and an equal chance of winning so quit acting like the spurs had some sort of advantage.  Anyone who says that this championship doesn't count has already lost credibility with me.

Problem #2: 3 championships are still 3 championships.  Every single one of those teams was led by Duncan, so the order in which they were received makes no difference.

Problem #3: Utah will be lucky to win more than 1 game in this series.  They are an inferior team.

Problem #4:  The Spurs were a slightly better team than Detroit 2 years ago.  Take away Ben Wallace and now the Spurs are clearly a better team.

So no, I don't agree.