hmmm the dragon should have destroyed all of wow... but then again the nerd suicide rate would drastically increase and only cool people would be left alive :P anyway the game still looks like cr-p to me... i tested it for 10 days twice (first about 5-6 years ago and second about 2 years ago) and it just wasnt good... even age of conan was better! at least it had blood and tittttties (the salt in the good game recipe ;) or just look at other mmorpgs like lotro, they at least tried to improve the game graphically while wow still looks like a DOS box game (almost) ;) and about the whole COD discussion: mediocre shooter with some fun multiplayer elements... the series stopped being good after mw1... i miss those doom2, quake2, duke3d, hexen, ... days! i want another singleplayer based shooter like they used to make them! high hopes on duke (takes) forever and rage!
almost every week i see an article on gamespot praising everything microsoft does..halo was always a mediocre shooter, nothing groundbreaking... if they want to feature a shooter that really made videogame history they should do doom. wolfenstein 3d or quake or some of those classics... not some boring shooter that never really had anything that stood out... weak...
@Johny_47 wont be a patch for sure, its ubis damn DRM (which got cracked already also on AC2)... if you want to play without being online crack the game...
@redcloud12345 and @klicko90 it was true that vista slowed things down a lot and ate your ram for breakfast but i'm runnin win7 x64 ult since release and its running great... plus you dont have either dx10 or 11 with xp... if ram is the problem go buy more (4 GB is enough for x64, even 2gb on x32) , its not that expensive anymore... and if you dont have even 100$ max you shouldnt buy games until you have :) plus i see that you have a single core 2.66GHz... without a dual core you can forget most of the new games nowadays, that's your problem, not win7 or RAM... plus this game seems more like a cheap console port on PC refering to the controls, i'm no programer but i think they also need to work on the code... so stop bullying win7, its finally a good OS from MS since xp...
even if the 360 usually has a little higher texture resolution, the graphics on the PS3 look a lot more natural (plus you have full 1080p) and if we're comparing the consoles as a whole your benefits from the PS3 make a HUGE difference: PSN is free (except some DLC and games you have to pay for if you want them) but if you want the XBox Live Gold account (that you need to play online) you pay the price. Now PSN also sells the newest Movies to download to your PS3 in HD. One of the best features (at least from my point of view) is the Blu-Ray Player. Microsoft promised this as an upgrade to the 360 but as far as I know they announced, that it won't happen after all (but hey, you knew this would happen! It's MS after all!) I think the slightly higher price for a PS3 gets you a lot of benefits in comparison to the 360. PS: I don't know how it works with the 360 (on the first XBox it was a real pain in the a**) but it's real simple to install a new harddisk to your PS3. all you have to do is open 2 screws, take the old one out and put a new one in. all you have to watch out for is if the new harddisk is compatible (I think only 5400s are supported). Plus the backup utility in the system settings lets you restore the complete system easily with an external drive.
RO-nIn187's comments