RabbidDawg's forum posts

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#1 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

It wasn't the score so much as the content of the review. I just don't have any interest in paying full price for a purely multiplayer game.Cow13_02_basic

Spot on with that comment. Really its like paying full price for half of a game. Single player is important, and MMO's have storys and some structure etc. Running around playing Deathmatch, Capture the Flag etc, just seems stupid if thats ALL there is to do in a game. I just dont get why these multiplayer only games command full price. 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

360 = Chuck norris

PS3 = fat over weight guy that had to be cut out of his house on Jerry Springer

Wii = Tiger hand held electronics....Oh wait no they are still better than the Wii.... 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#3 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

"If Devil May Cry ended up looking better onX360..."...........What do you mean if? Regardless of what way its ported, Devs know the 360 hardware better, Its gonna look better on the 360. I can just see the "PLEASE DONT BUY CAPCOM GAMES THEY ARE TEH LAZY" petitions, when the truth is that the 360's GPU is just better and the PS3 is just unbalanced with a great CPU and off the shelf GPU that is not as good as the 360s.

 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

The 360 needed a benchmark game, so bethesda rushed it a little, had Obliivon had the same exact amount of dev time the PS3 had.....It would have blown it out of the water, Regardless of the Cell the 360's GPU stomps mudholes in the RSX, and its ram is more accessible both ways not to just the GPU like the PS3.

The PS3 has better particle effects...were? You need teh glasses? I owned the PS3 and played resistance, it could have been done on the 360 10 times over and 10 times better. Resistance is one of my favorite games for the PS3 as was Oblivion, but every one knows had they both had an extra year, the 360 version would have killed, and there was NO excuse for Resistance to have textures like that. Granted it didnt look like ass, but it was fairly muddy and unclear even with HDMI. Resistance would have looked WAY better on the 360. 7.1 surround sound......and Im sure everyone has a reciever that can pump that out right:roll:....motion sensing= gimmick. The PS3 controler in no way shape or form was even built or made with motion sensing in mind...they just had to have an excuse for not having rumble.

PS3...more poly's....Everything I have ever seen has said that the 360 can push more poly's then the PS3. More characters on screen...Hell there hasnt been a PS3 game yet that has more characters on screen then Kameo:lol: Hmmm dont know what TV you play on but Oblivion just had an update, and it got all the shaders and most texture improvements the PS3 got, so there goes that argument, oh and it also loads a lot less than it did before, even though I will agree the PS3 version is a bit better visually, with the recent update its not by much, and were is the PS3's DLC?.

Gears taking 6 seconds to load textures...again WTF? Never seen it happen. I hate gears but even I know visually its a benchmark for a console, that Sony said was "inferior" to theres.

You guys must really be insecure about your purchase to defend the PS3 all the time trying to say that OMGzzers teh cell and blu-gayFTWzzersbbq111!!!11 teh graphics on the PS3 are way better...Sorry to tell ya from a technical standpoint there isnt on exclusive last year or this year that will even go toe to toe with Gears on any level of graphics physics what ever. I man enough to say my PS3 was a waste, Sony made promises with yet another console that they couldnt keep. Any one remeber the "PS2 is a super computer that will change gaming" argument that Sony mad for the PS2? Well I do...what a sham :lol:

Sony needs to start building a game library and worry about blu-ray movies later. Maybe some day the PS3 will be an equal to the 360, but for its tech specs it has on paper, it sure isnt living up to Sonys hype, and the proof is in the product. Like I keep saying, If Sony isnt going to fully utilize the Cell and Blu-ray..why should 3rd party's? If Sonys hardware isnt so unbalanced then PROVE IT! Until Sony can show something good in the way of games (super PC?....my ass!) Ill stick with my 360, it has more games and the games I want......and games that are still seemingly bigger and longer than anything sony has for this year or next probably.......Mass Effect anyone?

I mean...we all saw how 360 handled Oblivion...

Then we saw how PS3 handled it...

Point is...games like Resistance would NOT work on 360..they use faaar too many particle effects and rely heavily on the Cell architecture...

So why then take a game MADE for PS3 hardware from the gropund up...optimizng that hardware...and downgrade it to 360? You would literally have to remake the game for tricore...It would almost certainly lose a majority of particle effects and would also lose 7.1 surround sound...not to mention motion sensing...

The 360 hardware while strong just doesnt have the draw distance capabilities, particle effects or physics of PS3....plus with the PS3's abilities to generate faaar more polygons...we can have literally more characters and onscreen at once along with better clarity...360 fans know this cuz Oblivion looks muddy 50 feet infront of them and Gears sometimes takes 6 seconds to load textures....

NextGenNow
Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

Wow that was cool LOL

 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#6 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
[QUOTE="RazMaTaz-1"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="RazMaTaz-1"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]Cows get over it and deal with the fact that Forza got a AAA score. Enough with your pitty partyEltroz

:| this thread is a comparison about graphics, not whats the better game. Please Read more

Yes I am able to read. This thread is also yet another sad try at bashing Forza 2.

sad try? i think alot of people would agree that Forza was not graphically brilliant, and yet somehow got a 9?? The game looks worse than PGR3.

A lot of people? More just planet bovine from the posts I read. I know it is killing planet bovine that 360 has yet another AAA exclusive.

HolyS#$% Planet Bovine FTW!...Oh it hurts...the laughter...I love system wars if for nothing else the entertainment. This is why I dont have or need cable. :lol: 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#7 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

What I dont get is the fact I can scower the web and find info about how many poly's the 360 pushes....yet cant find a thing about the PS3's poly pushing power except from the days when Sony boasted about dual HDMI, and all the fetures that the PS3 was suppose to have but doesnt.

So whats the big secret? How is it that you can find all kinds of info on the 360's GPU and CPU etc, but only a little bit about the Cell and I cant find anything on the RSX, as far as actual specs go. I did find a site that said the inquierer had discovered the PS3 can actually only push 275 million poly's...due to some kind of bottle neck.

But they are not credible in my opinion. Can some one link any actual facts as to how many poly's the PS3 pushes? I mean actual facts, not stuff from 05, 0r early 06..something recent.

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
[QUOTE="DanBal76"]

Am i the only one that thinks Forza 2 looks better than GTHD?

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=19699&type=wmv&pl=game

Don't even try with GT4.

Redfingers

yes, you are. Didn't you notice the bare-ass environments in Forza 2 and the superior car models in GTHD?

No he's not. I have played both....LMAO@GTHD having superior car models! 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#9 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
HDD= very important if you want to have LIVE, demos, DLC content etc. even if you juat want a free silver account a HDD is still important and actually the 360 feels pointless with out one. I wish the core would just go away.
Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
one word....*YUCK*