I'm not one of those people who say that "Rock is dead", because it really isn't. We have many great rock bands today, but the media doesn't promote them as much as they did in the past. So my question is, Why can't the media promote the bands with talent that work hard to make good music, instead of promoting people who have no talent and use autotune to make dance music that all sounds the same to me.
depends, which decade of mainstream music we're talking about here. If it's the 2010's then the answer is none. There is not artist that puts a single shread of talent to good use these days. I hate it all.
Nirvana? Certainly not, or at least not re: Nevermind. Live they were kind of raw back and far from sounding like old Mr Vigs clean production. Songs played off Bleach certainly resembled their original form though, but again that the album was engineerined far less in comparison.
MarioRPGer
I think Reading '92 was the closest they were to the studio sound.
Nirvana? Certainly not, or at least not re: Nevermind. Live they were kind of raw back and far from sounding like old Mr Vigs clean production. Songs played off Bleach certainly resembled their original form though, but again that the album was engineerined far less in comparison.
personally I don't care for a band that simply replicates their studio sound - I don't pay to see a gig and listen to what could be an album played through a 50K rig.
poptart
well if a band is close to or better than the album, live, it shows that they actually have talent and that they don't need editing to make them sound good.
Log in to comment