Not me...IW got what they deserved.
Revan_911's forum posts
Actually I have a GTX 260 card. The thing is i am pissed, Nvidia has no clue. If i buy a GTX 480 i don't want just realistic water on a console port from a mediocre game. Because that's all there is to the PC version. The entire video they talk about water and show gameplay videos of water. It's pretty lame. I don't want all that power wasted on a unoptimized console port. Same with Arkham Asylum. They are trying to sell cards by adding unimpressive features and they say you can only run it with 500$ Nvidia card.This is not taking an initiative.[QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="chandu83"]
What is your problem? The game on PC is actually better, what are you complaining about? Nvidia is being proactive, that's hardly their fault.
So you are saying that the GeForce 4xx series shouldn't offer anything better compared to the last versions? If so, I bet you would be in the hardware forums complaining that the new series of cards are nothing better.
These days people complain about everything. As for PhyX, that's Nvidia's product, so too bad your ATI card isn't supporting it. Besides, I've told by many people that Batman AA looked and played very well on ATi cards. Again, its not Nvidia's fault that they are taking the initiative.
I am not being an unfair supporter of Nvidia. If ATI were to do this, I seriously wouldn't fault them for it.
chandu83
Every engineer, MBA graduate in Nvidia has no clue, but you do, right?
What game isn't a console port? We don't have an exclusive called Crysis anymore; the next STALKER won't be out till god knows when and even when it does come out, we don't know that it will be a PC exlusive. So...what should Nvidia do? Not support console ports anymore?
The thing is, at least they are doing something about it.
You don't know what Just Cause 2 is going to be like, you don't know what 480 is going to perform like.
So sit tight and wait for the fact to come out and then complain.
Most games aren't console ports...PC has way more developers than consoles. Not high budget developers but still. Why doesn't Nvidia fund and support PC developers? Instead of Just Cause 2, which i can spot a mile away it's a console game and no PC gamer would ever touch it.What are your specs? Also defrag, and update drivers.loading times :|
...
....
zz....
joopyme
Actually I have a GTX 260 card. The thing is i am pissed, Nvidia has no clue. If i buy a GTX 480 i don't want just realistic water on a console port from a mediocre game. Because that's all there is to the PC version. The entire video they talk about water and show gameplay videos of water. It's pretty lame. I don't want all that power wasted on a unoptimized console port. Same with Arkham Asylum. They are trying to sell cards by adding unimpressive features and they say you can only run it with 500$ Nvidia card.This is not taking an initiative.What is your problem? The game on PC is actually better, what are you complaining about? Nvidia is being proactive, that's hardly their fault.
So you are saying that the GeForce 4xx series shouldn't offer anything better compared to the last versions? If so, I bet you would be in the hardware forums complaining that the new series of cards are nothing better.
These days people complain about everything. As for PhyX, that's Nvidia's product, so too bad your ATI card isn't supporting it. Besides, I've told by many people that Batman AA looked and played very well on ATi cards. Again, its not Nvidia's fault that they are taking the initiative.
I am not being an unfair supporter of Nvidia. If ATI were to do this, I seriously wouldn't fault them for it.
chandu83
Nostalgia Critic =p even though he doesn't review games...well, he reviewed one.bobbetybobNC isn't funny. He's just awkward to watch.
Sellouts VS Money grabbing ****** Nothing to see here folks...I do think its good they are going after their brand, because they own some of the rights to the call of duty brand
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/03/04/ousted-infinity-ward-founders-file-suit-against-activision/
SiKh22
How much did halo 2 PC sell again?[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]
[QUOTE="Modern_Unit"]
Good joke there
ogvampire
well, the problem with halo2 was that it was 3 years too late.
It required Windows Vista, which pretty much no one had. It received mediocre score, and GFWL wasn't free back then. LOL
Log in to comment