[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="deadmeat59"]the cell is better then core duodeadmeat59
At raw computing maybe, but not for video games and the ilk. at raw computing cell has 7 spe at 3.2 ghz it can do 2.2 taraflops . but for games it has yet to show it can pass even the 360.
The Cell is a Single-precision floating point beast..but its not as good as the Core 2 Duo, even if it excels beyond all else in a couple of areas.
[QUOTE="Mordred19"]
The Xenon runs faster than most Dual-cores that I have seen (unless they are overclocking) and it has 3 cores as opposed to 2. Shouldn't the Xenon be leaps ahead of Core 2 Duos? I know the GPU has been surpassed by the newest video cards for PCs, but the CPU of the 360 looks like something still ahead of PCs. Is the Xenon better than PC CPUs?
LibertySaint
atm yes, because its a a tri core like you said, so obviously 3 is better then 2 and then all run at 3.2ghz with 1000mhz fsb's. so atm yes it next to quad cores that are around 2.4ghz for each core.
If the details were the same, as is you are utterly wrong. Intel's Netburst signaled the end of the era where you could just CPUs by clockspeed.
[QUOTE="RichterBelmont7"]No, not better than even the poorest of Pentium Ds.thirstychainsaw
It's not that weak :|
It is, I'm sure its stronger than them in some ways but as far as the average kind of power you can get over the entire range of tasks its weaker.
Okay, thats the new metric fopr what dbowman has to exceed. So if he want to eat an old hobo's hat which wearing another one made out of tinfoil and black plastic bags to the tune of Mental Hospital by Doctor Demento that should about do it.
Log in to comment