RobEspi's forum posts

  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for RobEspi
RobEspi

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RobEspi
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="RobEspi"]Just because it got the same rating doesn't mean it's not better. Standards change, you do know that right? I doubt it, you don't even know your roman numerals.LittleEnid

I heard insulting someone's intelligence is cool now.

Srsly? I heard being sarcastic on the internet is cool now.
Avatar image for RobEspi
RobEspi

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RobEspi
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts
[QUOTE="Kevin-V"][QUOTE="RobEspi"][QUOTE="Kevin-V"] Did you even read the review? ;) I have been long of the mind that developers need to compensate for improved precision in PC versions of their games. The 360 version was easier than your traditional stealth game but it was fine. On the easy side, but not too easy. The PC version of the game is so easy that even on realistic, the campaign never feels all that challenging. This is a big thing in a game that relies on tension (stalking your prey) and release (performing your execution). There were moments in the PC version where it just felt like I was playing bad Gears of War, because I could just pop up, land a headshot, and boom, I was done. I finished the campaign on realistic in a little over four hours.

How is the 360 version any different? I beat it in about 4 hours at my friend's house earlier using a Desert Eagle throughout majority of the game. It's a cakewalk on 360, and judging by the review it's a cakewalk on PC as well.

Well, if you found it a cakewalk on the 360, then let's say that on the PC, you would find it a real yawner.

Is it really that much easier? I'm actually intrigued by this.. I have serious doubts that a game could be that easy.
Avatar image for RobEspi
RobEspi

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RobEspi
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts
[QUOTE="oldkingallant"]

It got the BAD Emblem for "Too Easy". So shouldn't the 360 version receive it as well? Hmmmm.

Kevin-V
Did you even read the review? ;) I have been long of the mind that developers need to compensate for improved precision in PC versions of their games. The 360 version was easier than your traditional stealth game but it was fine. On the easy side, but not too easy. The PC version of the game is so easy that even on realistic, the campaign never feels all that challenging. This is a big thing in a game that relies on tension (stalking your prey) and release (performing your execution). There were moments in the PC version where it just felt like I was playing bad Gears of War, because I could just pop up, land a headshot, and boom, I was done. I finished the campaign on realistic in a little over four hours.

How is the 360 version any different? I beat it in about 4 hours at my friend's house earlier using a Desert Eagle throughout majority of the game. It's a cakewalk on 360, and judging by the review it's a cakewalk on PC as well.
Avatar image for RobEspi
RobEspi

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 RobEspi
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts
Why did the PC version get two medals under "Bad" when both are present in the console version, yet the 360 version does not have it in it's review? This is the score the game deserved by the way.
Avatar image for RobEspi
RobEspi

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RobEspi
Member since 2010 • 37 Posts
Good, about time. I hate white consoles and refuse to buy them. Hopefully I'll actually be able to play SSBB and both Mario Galaxy games now.
  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4