Oh the comments section. Where all the haters that haven't played or touched the game are easily mislead by reviews they otherwise never agree with.
The hypocrisy here is alarming.
The game is a ton of fun. If you played the beta you would know that. If you say the game got boring within ten hours, well then you must've forgotten that you were playing a beta.. how much entertainment were you expecting from two maps, two modes and a limited weapon set?
As a hardcore Battlefield fan, yes, this game is a bit more casual. But then again so was Bad Company and look at how much you all loved that game. There isn't anything wrong with that at all. I'm actually glad the game plays the way it does. If I want Battlefield, I play Battlefield. And if it played like Battlefield you would all bitch and moan about that too.
It doesn't even matter what you all think. The game will still sell a ton of copies and there will be hundreds of thousands of people that will love it. Because in the end this is still better than 90% of FPS out there.
@killafolston: Compared to Halo 2 and 3 and even Reach, it is not. Decent by it's own right but as a Halo game? Nah. Much much better than Halo 4 I'll give you that. H4 was atrocious. Glad 343 removed all the CoD like funtionality. Warzone is pretty great but I wish it had 32 or 48 players instead of 24 and bots. Feels like BF3 and BF4 do on last gen. Waste land and more often than not I'm shooting at bots instead of people like Titanfall except the AI for bots in Halo 5 is a hell of a lot better.
So can anyone tell me if it plays more like the classics? I know this time around you don't spend the entire game on one locale like the reboot. There's traveling to wildly varying locations like the old school TR's which is a huge plus to me. I know puzzle solving will never go back to what it once was but I've given up on that dream. Going back to puzzle solving that requires thinking wouldn't make the game as accessible as it is now.
Rushaoz's comments