@yvito125: I'm pretty damn sure Uncharted 4 will do better than that considering the PS4 install base is much bigger than the Xbox One's. No need to be a fanboy..

@petek480: Oh yea because the AI in Skyrim was SOOOO amazing. -_- That must be the reason Alduin kept making the same moves OVER and OVER and OVER again. Also must be why I beat the entire game using only one handed weapons and never died ONCE. Oh yea that Radiant AI is truly something else! -_-

Also I'm not sure if you knew this Fallout 4 is using the same engine Skyrim used. So yea I'm sure there will be an improvement in AI because new gen hardware is better than last but it's not the massive improvement you're fibbing about because you're just speculating. You have no idea if what you're talking about is even true. And if there's some article out there (which there isn't) where Bethesda is confirming all the claims you're making I will gladly read it and own up to it.

Dude even in the gameplay we've seen so far for Fallout 4 the AI looks ridiculously underwhelming.

@petek480: LOLOLOL Dude you really need to go read up on what you're talking about. What you're TRYING to refer to is called a CPU bottleneck. Which simply doesn't exist in a game like Fallout. Fallout is a GPU limited game. Matter of fact there's only a handful of games that are CPU limited on console. BF4 and GTA V being the only few I can think of. Unless you're pairing the Jaguar CPU in the Xbone and PS4 with a GTX 980 Ti you won't be experiencing any sort of CPU bottleneck whatsoever.

Trust me I'm a PC gamer first I've been dealing with CPU limitations for years. Back when Fallout 3 was out I played the game with a Q6600 and the CPU usage never hit over 70%. I also had a GTX 470 and ran the game completely maxed out. Game is not a hardware abuser by any means and neither is Fallout 4.

Just stop dude. You're inferring that Fallout has this amazing AI filled massive world where everything is being computed at once (which makes absolutely no sense from a developer standpoint) and in reality it's no where near that. Fallout 3 had terrible enemy AI and it was buggy as shit as per usual with every Bethesda game.

@petek480: Dude that makes ZERO sense whatsoever. There's a TONS more NPCs in The Witcher 3 than there are in Fallout.

Also CPU power to focus on graphics? Your opinion is immediately invalid after that statement. Apparently you haven't played W3 enough or at all.

@Saidrex: Bland and boring? That's you're opinion. I have never spent as much time in a game admiring the environment as much as I did with the Witcher 3 because it was so gorgeous. Can't agree with you there.

Not much to render: okay this is where you need to stop doing drugs. There's MUCH more rendered in W3 than there is is in all those Fallout 4 screenies combined, How you not seen how much foliage there is? The insane number of grass blades rendered? The dynamic lighting depending on the time of day and how it tranforms a gorgeous dawn into a thunderstorm with the sun peeking through the clouds?

No. Definitely can't agree with you there.

Fact is Fallout 4 looks like an extremely polished last gen game. The texture detail is great, but damn Metro Last Light had a much more visually appealing post nuclear apocalyptic landscape than Fallout 4 does.

@wkadalie: lol

@cgobeil: Errrr go back and look at the Witcher 3's screenies. Puts this to shame.

Requirements are a serious overshot. This game doesn't look nearly as good as The Witcher 3 and I can run that on my 2500k/GTX 680 set up on close to ultra and get decent framerate. I should be able to max this out on ultra no problem.

Also not sure if maybe it's because I was spoiled by W3's visuals but Fallout 4 is seriously lacking in the graphics department. Art style is cool as always but c'mon. This doesn't look next gen to me at all. The Skyrim engine needs to be dumped.

@Ezioprez9709: At the moment, I'm afraid so. :'(