[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]

It's better with the complete mod, and I noticed the performance to be about the same.

You should play the games in order of release though. SoC>CS>CoP.

Some people say play CoP second, but I wouldn't recommend it. CS is the prequel to SoC, so if names and locations aren't fresh in your memory, plot points lose most of their relevance.

topgunmv

I already said why you should play cs second in what you quoted.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]Nope. That was most likely the problem the first time around, but this time is due to the rights of the STALKER brand. R4gn4r0k

If that's the case they should continue working on it but give it a different name. Would be a shame if all the work they already did would go to waste.

Like howTrue Crime: Hong Kong was canceled but later got picked up bySquare Enix. They lost the True Crime name so they just renamed it 'Sleeping Dogs' but its basically the same game they continued to work on.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]Blocking used games will be good for two reasons. 1. Developers will make more money to make better games (assuming of course) 2. It will bring down Gamestop's evil empire of buying used games for very cheap and then selling them for only $5 less than new. They make a ton of profits off people who are too cheap to pay $5 more to actually support the developer. Although technically, they are just cashing in on the stupidity of the average consumer. Shinobi120

LOL, no, it won't.

1.) The money goes to Gamestop regardless of what condition you buy the game in. Devs get paid by the Publisher, Publisher gets paid when they sell the games (among other things) to the Retailers, the Retailers get paid when we buy the game from them.

In either case, the publishers are all in bed with the retailers anyway: Retailer sells used game, retailer uses money from used game sales to pay for exclusive pre-order DLC bonus. The Publisher gets the money regardless.

2.) Do you realize that by having used games banned, that they'll be coming up with more restrictions (even more worse than On-disc DLC & Online passes), as well as never lowering prices of their games even when they're years old, due to no competition from the used game market? You need to think about that.

2. Now you're just making up stuff, claiming BS things without any facts to back it up. There is no such thing as competition from the used game market, whatever the developers price their games at, used copies will ALWAYS be lower. There is no competition to be had.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="GD1551"]

Seeing as stalker 2 was going to be on consoles it can be argued that drove them out of business..

Nohtnym

Then who owns the rights now should try to sell it to valve.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]Capcom seems to be less and less interested in MegaMan games. Hell, they still have yet to end off the MegaMan X series. They've gone an entire generation without a new MMX game. norm41x

On topic: Screw you Capcom. I won't be buying diddly squat.

Awful day. My favorite franchise is pretty much toast.

*looks at signature, starts crying* :P

[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]

Lame. That was one of the few PC exclusives I was interested in. Oh well, that is what happens when you do not kake games on console.

GD1551

Seeing as stalker 2 was going to be on consoles it can be argued that drove them out of business..