[QUOTE="bingbaocao"]

[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"] Never played it :P (I know you want to hit me right now :P). But c'mon can you really think these games are on the same level as: F.E.A.R (just played the demo btw :P) Fatal frame Super mario galaxy ICO triology Final fantasy MGS Zelda etc. I can't speak for Doom, but i can speak for the other games you mentioned and i think it's a "no".nintendo-4life

yes, yes i can, in fact out of that list of yours, fatal frame is the only one that could give DOOM 3 a run for it's money

and Kameo is more atmospheric then Final Fantasy or MGS if you ask me

It's that Evanescene sig, bro. I'm tellin ya.

[QUOTE="bingbaocao"]

[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"] So because sony is Japanese Ratchet doesn't count even though it's developer is western? you gotta be kidding me

[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"]Personally i would say japanese games are more atmospheric. Because American games tend to target only 4 styles for the most part: Futuristic Sci-fi, medieval wats, agents (FBI and stuff like that), And modern wars. Of course you do have games like GTA which felt pretty atmospherical to me (and i can't believe i'm saying that), But still, if you're not a fan of the four types stated above, well.... tough luck i guess :Pnintendo-4life

Of course for you japanese games are more atmosferic, because you're saying western devs don't count. I love it how you said Kameo wasn't atmosferic, that remark alone pretty much states thatwe have nothing more to talk about

Because you like Evanescence, and therefore it's obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to "good taste". That's why.

Natal > Wii Motion Plus > Glow Motion

You're going to bust 400 dollars for two games? I'd invest the money in something better.

[QUOTE="Samox"]

Nah. PSP just straight up sucks.

SpruceCaboose

Halo, of course. The only right answer.

Nah. PSP just straight up sucks.

Halo: Combat Evolved

Goldeneye

Gears of War

I also really enjoyed Planetside. Which was a FPS MMO.