A week has 7 * 24 hours in it. 168 hours.
168 hours - 100 hours = 68 hours.
Assuming 8 hours of sleep is normal, 8 * 7 = 56. 
68 hours - 56 hours = 12 hours. 
Assuming 15 minutes of eating time per three meals a day is normal, ((15*3)*7)/60=5.25.
12 hours - 5.25 hours = 6.75 hours.
6.75 hours of free time per week isn't worth 200K a year regardless of taxation, especially considering unfactored time-costs (transportation, etc.).

Intercepted communications, telling govt soldiers to prepare for chemical exposure (the govt attacking the gassed areas right after they were gassed).
This isn't evidence. Regardless of who fired them, military forces will prepare for chemical exposure. It is evidence when they are told before the chemical attack occured... 

We now the rockets used to deliver the chemicals have only been seen used by the govt forces.
The United States has stated that they don't know, and I know you're not a skeptic.  That just talks about how the U.S isnt sure Assad personally ordered it and we arent sure where all his chemical weapons are. It has nothing to do with the weapons linked to the attack which have only been seen used by the regime forces
We know the rockets came from the direction of several govt bases We know the rockets hit rebel controlled areas 
We know that government bases have been overrun by the rebels as well. Yeah some bases have been overun its a war, the bases in the direction of the rocket attack were still under govt control.
We knew 3 days before it happened the govt was preparing for a chemical attack
Link stating that they were preparing to launch chemical weapons (not be affected by them) at the rebels? Link
We know the govt has large stock piles of chemical weapons (while the rebels don't)
First part is true although not "large"; no proof of the second claim. According to everyone the rebels don't.
We know the govt delayed UN inspectors by shelling the area with conventional weapons. Not even relevant. This is as bad or even worse than the idea that the weapons came from Libya (it IS confirmed that Libya's chemical weapon stockpiles went missing and were found in the hands of Al-Qaeda and Northern African militant factions - but it is not known that they went to Syria, even though Al-Qaeda has been aiding rebels). What? The government stalled the inspectors while they continued shelling the area to try and destroy evidence.

Person0

And the last point is conjecture - as you confirmed yourself. No better than all the conspiracy theories.

Intercepted communications, telling govt soldiers to prepare for chemical exposure (the govt attacking the gassed areas right after they were gassed).
This isn't evidence. Regardless of who fired them, military forces will prepare for chemical exposure.
We now the rockets used to deliver the chemicals have only been seen used by the govt forces.
The United States has stated that they don't know, and I know you're not a skeptic.
We know the rockets came from the direction of several govt bases We know the rockets hit rebel controlled areas 
We know that government bases have been overrun by the rebels as well.
We knew 3 days before it happened the govt was preparing for a chemical attack
Link stating that they were preparing to launch chemical weapons (not be affected by them) at the rebels?
We know the govt has large stock piles of chemical weapons (while the rebels don't)
First part is true although not "large"; no proof of the second claim.
We know the govt delayed UN inspectors by shelling the area with conventional weapons. Not even relevant. This is as bad or even worse than the idea that the weapons came from Libya (it IS confirmed that Libya's chemical weapon stockpiles went missing and were found in the hands of Al-Qaeda and Northern African militant factions - but it is not known that they went to Syria, even though Al-Qaeda has been aiding rebels).

Person0

Criticizing music is fine as long as you understand what you're talking about. If you criticize the person's taste then it boils down to immaturity.

Christie is all charisma. He's just another neocon like the rest. Rand tried to get a following and then buttered up with the GOP mainline buffoons. I don't think there's any hope to be found in the currently discussed political candidates, but then again that feeling seems to be the norm at this point. 

It's only bad when they're being exploited, and in Dimebag's case that's exactly what Phil Anselmo wanted to do.

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Why are you surprised that George Orwell is loved by libertarians?BossPerson

well republicans using regean is fair, although i dont think he would agree with all of the standard policies espoused by todays republicansBossPerson

Thinking in terms of US Presidents here:

Dems - Taft, FDR, sometimes Wilson, and JFK
Reps -  Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and especially Reagan
Libs - Andrew Jackson (only because of his hatred of the national bank)

oh and it doesnt get much more crazy than republicans trying to claim jesus for themselvesBossPerson

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

>itt, people are saying calc classes are hard

WTF?

Wasdie

They are to some people including myself. Math itself is just learning how to apply proven functions. That can be tricky to learn how to identify what functions to use at the right time. 

For me it's far more my apathy. I just don't give a shit about math.