The point about the loch ness, is I think it is a dinosaur in the sea, see the thing is we only know about 4 percent of the waters, so what I think is there are a lot of them down there. Even if you think they all died millions of years ago, these ones probably would of survived.
SegaGenesisfan's forum posts
Dude, I just posted it, you didnt even read the entire thing.... Or you just glazed over it, but anyways, I want someone to explain the bibles account for dinosaurs.
Now the word Dinosaur is what we use to refer to those big creatures that are no more, as much as we know (the fact is we only know about 4 percent of the ocean I think). Well if you have ever read the bible, it has the word "dragon," which obviously is not just some simple creature, and there is more reason than not to think this is what they called dinosaurs... So, if dinosaurs died "millions of years ago..." then how come the authors know who these things are? I mean maybe they found bones, but in this verse:
their wine is the poison of dragons,
and the cruel venom of asps
Isnt that peculiar? This is only the beggining, then you can contrast this with medieval myths about dragons. To be honest, I dont think those were myths, they had to have a source for what they thought, no musician ever just comes with a song right off their heads out of nothing. They have to have some form of inspiration. I am not sayying they had inspiration exactly, I am sayying they even observed them. I am not trying a religious debate, nor am I trying to totally refute evolution, I guess I have this question. How did they know? What I am sayying is that dragons ARE the same as dinosaurs. Not to mention that dragons have been on pottery. Then, we got the whole lock ness thingy, so if they all died millions of years ago, why does one still exist, they even have photographs of him, and it looks like a dinosaur. Now, I remember thinking that they were just seeing things, but when there is photos of the creatures head that is shaped like a bracheosauraus. Its hard to deny.
I thought Starcraft was pretty bad, TBH(I LOVED Blizzard's other franchises, bar WoW, but I couldn't see the charm in Starcraft, it's a 2D Warcraft 3 with a rather generic sci-fi setting, a worse map editor, no way to play on teams offline and less stuff...XD), but I played Star Wars:Galactic Battlegrounds, which is supposedly just a rehash of an AoE game, and I loved it, so I'd definitely go with AoE. XD
enix165
Someone never played user map settings >_>, who also never realised that having an alien versus predator rts (essentially) is far from generic. By the way the battlegrounds game was the definition of generic >_>. Or at least clone. Hold on, I must admit, it was fun when they would send huge lines of droids, and totally take them out with AT AT. It had charm I must admit... But still, it was just a mod on AOE 2. Man, I forgot that game altogether 0_0
Its for men, it was secretly made that way to discourage women from playing Halo Combat Evolved. We would not want women knowing how to tea-bag, or how to hit someone in the back.... Do we?
I'm not sure how you formed that opinion. Both the 16 bit Castlevania games play identically.[QUOTE="SegaGenesisfan"]Sega Genesis, I played Castlevania 4, its good if you want to fall asleep real fast.Rocky32189
Are you kidding me? Thats like sayying, if it has the name Castlevania, it plays the same on each game.
Sega Genesis, I played Castlevania 4, its good if you want to fall asleep real fast. If you like rpg then the ps1 is great.
Log in to comment