@Xristophoros: Yet they said that AC2 runs better on XO than on 360. Weird, isn't it? Someone is trolling about, and it's not me.

@Xristophoros: You are a fanboy indeed!
I saw the video you posted and the reviewers only said the only game that is disappointing and often unplayable is Halo Reach, whereas the rest of the games they say they are impressed on how well they play on XO.

Mass Effect has better frame rate in areas where the 360 falters, and viceversa. The frame rate during battles dips, but seldom do they get under 20 fps, and in all other areas the frame rate is actually better than on 360. They also mention that Mass Effect never really ran smoothly on 360.

They concluded that the rest of the games play better on XO.

For those interested but with limited time go to the end of the video (at 18:10 minutes) where you'll only see the summary .

@Diablo-B @Sergsky

Flawed like in a gangster movie. You wouldn't deduct points in a review of say, Good Fellas, because the characters are flawed, would you?

I wonder what the review score would have been if the reviewer had been male.

I haven't played the game so I don't have an opinion on what I think the score should be, but apparently a whole point was deducted for portraying women like every other GTA game has done in the past.

BTW, I think all characters in GTA games are really flawed, so why is this an issue with the reviewer?

@AtotehZ Exactly, the game is that old, and it is one of the first full 3D third-person games ever made, so it was an incredible feat for its time. This guy is acting like a kid that never played anything before 2009. Next time he'll say something similar about Metal Gear Solid o Mario 64.
So why waste our time watching and listening to someone so stupid. It is insulting; like watching someone mocking movies from the 50s.

@Mimorpg http://www.gamespot.com/events/gdc-2013/story.html?sid=6406190

And he call himself a gamer? He should definitely should choose a different career.

@alenth @Sergsky I am outside, that is why we see things differently.

@ObeseChipmunk @Sergsky

I guess it depends on how people feel about their beliefs. For example, many Buddhists say they're religious because their faith is blind towards many of the arguments, like say, life and rebirth. Others consider themselves Buddhist but just because they agree with the Buddhist philosophy, but they are rational about it. Again, in the case of death and rebirth they may think it is a logical consequence of the transmission of the mind as energy.

I am not saying they are right or wrong, just that some of the religious traditions aren't seen as religions by many of their adherents.

@M3o5nster @Sergsky

I never saw that. I guess you saw what you wanted to see.