Decent games, but definitely not in my top 10
If you want a quick heads up read here ***POSSIBLE SPOILERS***
AC1 sets the standard, great graphics and all, combat suck IMO, it's BASICALLY about:
Desmond, a descendant from a long line of Assassins, SHOCKER:roll: is kidnapped by a group of ppl and forced into a machine known as the Animus upon entering this machine, he is able to relive the life of one of his ancestors known as Altair (basically a master assassin), the game consists of Altair following orders from his master Al Mualim, to assassinate a few figures from the crusades - These figures were actually there at the time of the crusades too! Anyway it contains all generic storyline features IMO, you know; do this, get betrayed BLAH BLAH BLAH spoiler free ftw! Anyway AC1 features better graphics then 2 IMO but comes with repetitive and sometimes frustrating gameplay in the forms of side tasks you are requested to perform on order to unlock assassination meories and it goes from there
AC2 basically picks up where the last game left off, mediocre graphics, sukcish combat and a collectibles (100 to be exact which i hate) IMO
In AC2 you've (Desomd) realised that you've been kidnapped by the Templars (enemy of the assassins) BLAH BLAH time to escape BLAH!
Anyway you meet up with fellow assassins and get put into another memory machine known as wait for it; the animus 2.0 8)
Upon entering the animus 2.0 you go into another ancestors memory instead of Altair, you are know Ezio...it's kind of a better story with less repetitive gameplay but still nothing special IMO
Hope this helps!
IamBEASTMODE
ok we get it you think ac is mediocre he asked about the story not gameplay 
Log in to comment