[QUOTE="DiscoBurn"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"][QUOTE="mac906"][QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]

No no no! That's now how you get banned! You have to say, "Mountain Dew is an ugly, UGLY soft drink." Oh crap! *dodges ban hammer*

JustPlainLucas

Well, it doesn't matter what we say about Mountain Dew anymore, because they're no longer giving CNET anymore money. But yeah, Gamer Fuel was the ugliest soda I've ever had. The cover system was really, really broken.

Personally I thought it tasted like Master Chief's piss.

Have you ever tasted Master Chief's piss? Obviously not, because if you had you'd know that it tastes more like gasoline, and has a similar effect as well over20 cans of spinach. Get your facts straight before you troll on these boards. Sheesh.

:lol:

You broke the ToS~! :lol:

gamestop 20 gig $450 bucks i think thats good i would have a bluray player and a ps3.xjet039

I would suggest the TC get the 60GB instead, it's pretty superior to the 20GB skew as far as I'm concerned. Enough to spend the extra $50.

Are you guys serious? It has to be this, hands down greatest video game commercial ever.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=UvljN9ycqLg

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"][QUOTE="funnymario"][QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

emawk

Its far different from any standard platformer. Sure, you could call going from planet to planeta gimmick but it is still new. It may have been done before to some slight degree in other games (Ratchet and Clank) but the concept is still rather original.

I can't really see how that's original. It's pretty much like jumping from one platform to another. It's not as if the planets were huge or something.

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word innovative. Honestly the only innvoative platformer coming out that is known about would be Little Big Planet.

P.S. There are supposed to be some larger planets, by the way.

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

funnymario

Its far different from any standard platformer. Sure, you could call going from planet to planeta gimmick but it is still new. It may have been done before to some slight degree in other games (Ratchet and Clank) but the concept is still rather original.

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Well it is an opinion. For some people the Wii may be the best choice of a console (if they can only afford one), for others it may be a 360, PS3, or PC. As for me, personally I would rather play SSBB than any other "next-gen" fighter, and SMG instead of Ratchet and Clank 3 or Banjo Kazooie 3... but that's just me. emawk

How would you know you want to play Mario Galaxy more than Banjo Kazooie 3 if you don't know anything about that game? Are you a fanboy?

Oh the irony...

As to answer your question I would like to play them more as they interest me alot more.

EDIT: Also, its not as if I don't know anything about either of the games. Looking at Banjo Kazooie's and Tooie's gameplay, I'm far less interested in the game than SMG.

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

TOTAL_DEFENSE_0

if wii wants to be taken seriously like 360/PS3, those 50 dollar games should match

Well it is an opinion. For some people the Wii may be the best choice of a console (if they can only afford one), for others it may be a 360, PS3, or PC. As for me, personally I would rather play SSBB than any other "next-gen" fighter, and SMG instead of Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction or Banjo Kazooie 3... but that's just me.