Simulator_Shock's forum posts

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#1 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

I find Playstation's Eye Toy and Xbox's Natal to both be equally pathetic. Any self-respecting gamer wouldn't touch either of em.

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#2 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

1. Tekken 6

2. Brutal Legend

3. Metal Gear Solid Rising (I know its a hell of a long way off)

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#3 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

[QUOTE="Simulator_Shock"]

It's very ironic how PS3 fanboys on system wars constantly say "xbox games suck, we don't need anything they have, we have *insert ps3-exclusive games, blah blah". And now we have news from some obscure source that says there might be a 360 game ported to the PS3, and now all of a sudden its "oh boy, we might get Gears or Mass Effect!!"......The Irony is overwhelming.

finalfantasy94

You know it works both ways.

Even so, its always amusing how fanboys will bash "X Game" and then as soon as some unreliable source says that said game might end up on their console, they quickly turn the other cheek.
Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#4 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

It's very ironic how PS3 fanboys on system wars constantly say "xbox games suck, we don't need anything they have, we have *insert ps3-exclusive games, blah blah". And now we have news from some obscure source that says there might be a 360 game ported to the PS3, and now all of a sudden its "oh boy, we might get Gears or Mass Effect!!"......The Irony is overwhelming.

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#5 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

No, because I know I wouldn't be laughing after spending money on those stupid crappy games...

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#6 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

Extermination for PS2. Yes this was yet another survival horror game, but it was different. I always thought of it as a cross between the movie The Thing and Resident Evil. You were stranded in a winter military base where this alien virus that mutated people into nasty things was running amuck, but what made it unique was that you only had one weapon throughout the entire game, and you could customize it with scopes, grenade launchers etc. The game had decent graphics for its time, good voice acting, and a likeable character.

This game was released early on in the PS2's life, so I guess that's why it didn't get noticed. But whenever people talk about survival horror games other than Silent Hill and Resident Evil, this game never gets mention, but it should! It's definitley one of the most underated and overlooked gems I have played.

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#7 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts
[QUOTE="Treflis"]Resident Evil 4 and upwards. They are fun but they're not Resident Evil. As for the Outbreak games, I enjoyed them. Probably the last games to follow the old Resident Evil formula sadly. I'm sure I also stand alone in this matter.

No your not alone in that opinion, as I always felt that RE4 and 5 were not Resident Evil games. They are fun games, but there is nothing survival-horror about them. They are action games, straight and simple. In fact RE5 probably had the least to do with anything RE, it just felt like I was playing some action game with Chris Redfield in it. It's like Capcom totally forgot how the series started....
Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#8 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts
Saturn doesn't have a better library than PS1. I'm a Sega homer and I can't even believe that anyone would say that the Saturn library is better. AM2 was amazing, but not prolific enough to stem the tied of third party Sony exclusives. wstfld
Saturn library was decent, but Playstation's library was vastly superior. End of story.
Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#9 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

Before this whole pointless nerd argument get's out of hand, I will say that the only edge that the Saturn had over the Playstation was a better audiochip. Several Saturn games had much better sound over their PS1 counterparts, and the Saturn port of Resident Evil proves this.

Avatar image for Simulator_Shock
Simulator_Shock

1779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

82

Followers

Reviews: -5

User Lists: 0

#10 Simulator_Shock
Member since 2006 • 1779 Posts

I think I remember seeing the Burning Rangers ad in an old Gamepro Magazine I had....And I'm not saying that I never saw the Saturn anywhere, it's just I never met anyone that had one.