Forum Posts Following Followers
11344 202 165

SmashBrosLegend Blog

Save Johnny Reb!

I go to South High School, home of the Rebels. Our mascot is Johnny Reb, and recently the Student Council decided that he was too racist and should be removed. Usually our senate is preoccupied with coloring posters for random school events which no one will attend, but now they've decided to draw attention to themselves by crusading against what they percieve as racism. I think it' s ridiculous. Here is my letter. --------- To the South High students, teachers, staff, and administration: As a descendant of Confederate General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson, it absolutely appalls me to see people of this school trying to get rid of Johnny Reb. Listed are several reasons why removing him would be nothing short of a travesty. Slavery was one of the most terrible periods in American history, and anyone who tries to justify it is a fool. But I don't think people are making a concerted effort to understand it. People assume that Southern slavery was based on racism, which is untrue. Slavery was out of economic necessity (which again does not justify or excuse it; it was still something that never should have happened). The Southern economy was based on plantations, and in order to maintain these plantations cheap labor was needed. Of course there were racists in the South and there still are today, but to generalize that the entire population was or is racist is quite ridiculous. Next, we have people confusing the Abolitionist movement with the intentions of the Union Government. True, both wanted to end slavery, but the similarities end there. The Abolitionist movement truly believed that black people were worthy of equal rights, and their intentions were of the noblest sort. The reasons the Union had for ending slavery were purely selfish. Southern plantations produced so much money that the individual Southern states were getting too powerful. The Union government was threatened by this. The Union didn't care about the well-being of black people any more than the South did, evidenced by the fact that it took until nearly 100 years after the end of the Civil War for black people to get the rights that they deserved. The South wanted to secede from the Union because they believed it was a right guaranteed by the Constitution. They chose to call themselves the Confederacy after the Articles of Confederation, the first written plan for American government. It favored state rights over federal rights. Once again, not everyone in the South was a racist. General Jackson, second-in-command of the Confederacy, was the very first professor in the history of the Virginia Military Institute to allow black students in his classes. Ulysses S. Grant, commander of the Union army, owned slaves at the start of the Civil War. Robert E. Lee, commander of the Confederate forces, did not. Less than 33% of white Southerners owned slaves before the war started. To assign a racist connotation to everyone in the Confederacy is in itself an act of racism. People fail to understand that Johnny Reb also represents hundreds of years of American Southern culture. There is certainly a negative aspect to it, but to focus on only the negatives is unfair. The slave trade started under the French and Portuguese flags. Is it now wrong to be French or Portuguese? It is all well and good to crusade against things that may offend people, but to crusade against everything that may offend people is unrealistic. Nothing would be left, because a racist connotation can be assigned to almost anything if you try hard enough. To take down Johnny Reb because you assume he is a racist symbol perpetuates the incorrect stereotype that all Southerners are racists. It is an insult to my people. But no one considered that fact, did they? My heritage is something to be ashamed of, right? That is the message put across by the removal of Johnny Reb. This is discrimination, and I won't stand for it. Symbols only have the meanings that we as a society choose to assign them, and rather than getting rid of the symbol, I believe we should attempt to correct these misunderstandings. Generations upon generations of South High School students have proudly graduated as Rebels. To change such a tradition at this point in time is illogical. If you want to examine this further, we can take a look at some other schools in the state. We have the East High Angels: potentially offensive to non-Christians. We have the West High Cowboys: potentially offensive to Native Americans. We have the North High Vikings, named for a group of people famous for raping and pillaging. Should we now change all of those school mascots? I am not a racist, and I am glad that the Union prevailed in the Civil War. I am not proud of the actions of my forefathers, and nor should I be. But there is not one group of people on the planet whose ancestors weren't guilty of some wrongdoing at some point in the past. I believe that people of all races, genders, nationalities, religions, and sexual orientations should be equal under the law. This motion to remove Johnny Reb is one of good intention, but I believe it is misguided and the process will only serve to cause further cultural misunderstanding. I respectfully ask that you do not remove Johnny Reb from this school. Sincerely, Jason

Stop inviting me to your crappy unions/Go Giants

Unless we've previously discussed something, I don't want to join your damn union. I swear, I have to turn down 4-5 invites per day. And I can't let the unions just sit there, because having too many outstanding invites blocks invites from unions that I actually might want to join. Also, I love to see the Patriots lose. I called the score. So many people are going to have to eat it tomorrow...

New PC building will resume in September

I was been saving up for the necessary parts for my new rig (I needed about 265 more), but I decided to just wait for my birthday instead. My brother got a two free computers from his work, both missing operating systems. I'll list the specs. PC# 1: Intel Celeron 1.8 ghz processor 256MB DDR RAM 40 GB hard drive CDRW/DVD ROM PC# 2: AMD Athlon 1.3 ghz processor 128 MB DDR RAM 20 GB hard drive CD ROM I upgraded them both, using parts from my old PCs. I'll now list the new specs. PC# 1: Intel Celeron 2.4 ghz processor 512 MB DDR RAM 60 GB hard drive CDRW/DVD ROM Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon PC# 2: AMD Athlon 1.3 ghz processor 384 MB DDR RAM 40 GB hard drive CD ROM Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon Not great specs by any stretch, but that's ok. I'll be using the Celeron model until September, and I'll likely sell the other. It's not like I really need a top of the line PC to run Ubuntu. Just for fun, here are the specs for the PC that I was building: Intel Pentium D Dual Core processor @ 3.0 ghz, 2x2MB L2 cache, 800 mhz FSB 2 GB DDR2 800 RAM (upgradable to 8GB) 160 GB SATA hard drive @7200 RPM Intel GMA 3100 integrated graphics (256MB shared memory, 400mhz core) The integrated graphics is kind of lame, but that was only supposed to be temporary. I was going to buy a nice Radeon card, a bigger hard drive, some more RAM, and a DVD burner when I got the money together. Now that I've decided to wait and save some more money to combine with my birthday money, I'll be going for a nice Core 2 Duo processor and a high-end Radeon card.

I'm switching to Linux permanently.

As many of you know, I used to dual-boot Windows and Ubuntu. Well, recently my motherboard died. I decided that I didn't really want to call Microsoft and beg them to let me transfer my OS when my new motherboard inevitably decides that it won't cooperate with my old OS, hard drive and drivers and such. So I'm just going to run Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon exclusively. I've got a new motherboard on the way from Newegg. While I was at it, I ordered a 3.0ghz dual-core CPU, a new graphics card, and 2GB of RAM.

The Gamespot staff is guilty by association.

I've been reading various blog posts and comments from some of the Gamespot staff (programmers, admins, editors, ect), and the prevailing attitude within said blog posts is that it isn't their fault, and there's nothing they can do about it. They're whining about people questioning the integrity and credibility of Gamespot as a whole, stating that only a few people were involved with it. They're appealing to the public to stop voicing their opinions. That is a load of crap. You're all guilty by association. Associaton with CNET. You say your integrity is still intact. Not even close. Integrity is not sitting down and taking this, and keeping your mouths shut because you fear for your jobs. Integrity is doing the right thing, no matter the situation. Your morals are important to you, but not important enough to give up your paychecks, right? If any of you had true integrity, you would set the record straight and speak out in support of Jeff Gerstmann (who by my estimation is the only one of the Gamespot staff capable of exhibiting integrity, save Tim Tracey). Someone with true integrity would not want to be associated with a company that engages in such practices in the first place. If you want people to stop questioning your integrity, show some damn integrity. Stand up for what you believe in, you cowards. You have no right to come to the defense of your own integrity while you continue to collect checks from CNET, you hypocites. And as for credibility, how can anyone claim that this site still has a shred of it? If a man is fired for posting his review and his honest, unbiased assessment in spite of the advertising money given to the site, then the credibility of said site is forever tarnished. Period. How are we to know that previous reviews were not swayed by the influence of publisher money? How do we know that future ones will not be? We don't, and the validity of this site's review section is therefore voided. Nothing can ever be done to repair it. If you want to keep your job at Gamespot, be my guest. You obviously all have yourselves and your family to support. But if you're going to continue to associate yourselves with CNET, don't even mention integrity or credibility. You can't be a hypocrite and preserve your integrity. Accept the fact that you're no better than the slimeballs who perpetrated this injustice and keep your damn mouths shut if you're going to continue to accept CNETs tainted dollars. Most of all, don't you dare try to silence the cries of injustice coming from the community. Enough with your whiney blog posts about how your feelings have been hurt. You've brought it all upon yourself, and it is our right to voice our opinions, you god damned cowards. Follow the lead of Tim and Jeff, or shut the hell up. Never compromise your integrity.
  • 19 results
  • 1
  • 2