SmugDarkLoser0's forum posts

  • 23 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
Halol died when Bungie left M$heeweesRus
Halo 4 was the best campaign in the series. Halo 4 was a campaign focused halo. You guys say you like single player shit but don't actually. They were appealing to hardcore halo mythos crowd, not the mp guys really. Don't hate on them for it. The multiplayer has improved drastically through patches since it came out. Its actually pretty damn good now.t
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
[QUOTE="heeweesRus"]No. You can't judge who won E3 by what happened after. The general consensus is that Sony won E3.

But wasn't this due to drm policies? It changed. I just feel like sonys only ticket to the ps4 getting its praise is kind of invalidated. Its as if they announced games at e3 and they all got cancelled the week after.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
Sony's E3 show was "hey we're not Microsoft". Basically the only real success was their DRM policies. MS's policies are now the same. The result of Sony's E3 in terms of exclusive major titles- what we care about in system wars- was that one Steampunk game (1893 or whatever). Final Fantasy Versus 13 (FF15) lost exclusivity. Kingdom Hearts 3 was also announced, but nope, not exclusive either. These would all be normally considered major blows for Sony. Other new games were non-existant. They were all riding on already announced titled. Microsoft got: - an exclusive Insomniac game (Sunset Overdrive) - Killer Instinct 3 - Project Spark - D4 - Halo 5 - Crimson Dragon (panzer dragoon sequel) - That trailer for the untitled Black Tusk game (some sort of espionage game?) - Titanfall - Dead Rising 3 and then going into the conference they already had Forza5, Quantum Break,and some bullshit Kinect Sports and Disney game. I just find it kind of hilarious. If it weren't for the DRM, people would have said MS's conference absolutely ripped apart Sony's, and that Sony's announcements themselves were kind of hitters to themselves once details came out. Now that there's no DRM, what the heck guys? I just don't know what you guys could possibly want from MS at this point. I mean, it does cost $100 more, but Is this really an issue? Both now have paid online, same DRM policies. I just don't see what any of you really want from them. I'm left flabbergasted. Ms announced a ton of new ips and a couple of big franchise sequels. What exactly could they have done to pleased you? In terms of actual objective things. What is sony doing better than MS at this point? Do you guys actually value killzone? Infamous sure. Knack sure. Drive club over forza? Wan? IM sort of at a loss and feel disconnected from the mindset of all you guys who think the ps4 looks remotely better than the Xbox.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
furthermore, xbox one gold subs now work for the whole console. one sub for a console. currently ps+ does not work this way so....
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
You know, you can bash the policies of the xbox one, go ahead, I think some of it is garbage too. However, Sony had a horrid horrid E3. They lost final fantasy versus 13 exclusivity. They lost Kingdom Hearts 3 exclusivity PSN now charges for online multiplayer. One new exclusive big title (things that will count here in System Wars) was announced (that steampunk game 1893 or whatever). The Ps3 had one exclusive game announced, lost 2 major titles thought to be exclusive, and now charges for online. The Xbox One got Halo 5, Ryse, Killer Instinct, Sunset Overdrive, D4 (deadly premonition cult classic successor), Crimson Dragon (Panzer Dragoon successor), Dead Rising 3 all announced as exclusive, and then that Titan game and Spark announced as PC/xbox titles (not on Ps4). Then there was that Black Tusk game teased but who cares at this point. That's honestly a big deal. Sony had a really bad E3. MS had a really good E3. People are just still hung up over the xbox one drm stuff, which I have issue with myself. However, realistically, if you at least take MS out of the picture, Sony's E3 **** sucked ass.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wiisdom"]waitr I'm going to switch to caps lock for this one..... THE FACT THAT LEMMINGS THINK THIS IS GOOD NEWS IS REALLY REALLY SADDDDDDDDDD

i want to share my games with you. i can do this with xbox one. i cannot do this with ps4 unless i mail you it and im afraid you wont send it back. in practice, this is actua'ly better, if the article is true.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts

That's actually a nice feature, but they still need to clarify what "family" actually means.

catfishmoon23
If it's not tied to a console, does it matter?
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
I could make a program that calculates bs numbers use 20GB. What's his point? His programming team sucks? His game doesn't do anything good graphically. This guy isn't a programmer, and should lay off the technical commentary.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts

This isn't going to work how the TC thinks, get real dude. You'll have to be part of the family, probably have to be on the same internet, can only have a game running in one place at a time etc...

 

Wake up lems.

Eddie-Vedder
It amounts to adding someone to the group. I concede on the playing at the same time won't work-- probably won't, someone else pointed that out. But essentially you can borrow between 10 people. Not bad. Have you let more than that number of people borrow your games this gne/borrowed from? I havent. I doubt you have--> although Im sure there are exceptions to this.
Avatar image for SmugDarkLoser0
SmugDarkLoser0

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SmugDarkLoser0
Member since 2013 • 29 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Blabadon"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]needs to be lv10 to post. and the competition allows you to share your games with as many people as you want.

Missing TC's point. Gamesharing the digital version, if he's correct

the sharing thing seemed to imply that while your copy is "shared", the other person can't play. regardless, i already do this with PSN.

If that's how you took it. Well, I mean, I don't see why the xbox one is getting so much flack then in either case. So you can choose 10 people to lend games to, and play them as long as the other person isn't. That's pretty good. It's a convenient way of sharing games, and 9 friends is good enough for most people I think, realistically. Used games costs a stipend to the retailers, which really doesn't affect you much. So like, the worst case the xbox one is hurting is selling your games on ebay, which probably doesn't really impact many people, however, I could easily see people paying to be added to other peoples groups. I mean, I just feel like in practice the xbox ones policys arent that bad-- in a realistic situation.
  • 23 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3