SolidButtCheakS's forum posts

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts
@last_lap said:

wonder why they don't get games🤦‍♂️

Yes I'm a lem

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

@silentchief said:

Except that isn't true.

This stat has nothing to do with what I said. 😑

PC gaming has been growing faster than console gaming for a long time now. Capcom specifically has been seeing major growth on PC long before Sony ports were even considered a possibility.

Attributing Capcoms continued growth on PC to Sony ports is nonsensical, a major reach. All we're seeing here is a continuing trend.

@silentchief said:

As for Playstation exclusives not selling that is factually just not true.

I never said this either. 😑

The games that actively keep the overwhelming majority of the Playstation user base engaged are not Sonys first party titles. The idea that droves of console gamers are jumping ship to PC over the occasional first party port is just silly. Extending that even further to account for Capcoms continuing PC growth is nonsense.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts
@silentchief said:

So exactly what I said would happen is happening. Once Playstation released exclusives on PC some of their consumers would simply just move to PC and once that happens they will buy all their games on Steam.

This is what happens when you make your brand irrelevant.

What?

The market has been trending towards PC for well over a decade now. Existing console gamers moving to PC, new gamers starting with PC.

There are plenty of obvious reasons for this.

Sony bringing their first party games over isn't the cause, they're just another pub following the trend.

Hilarious to assume Sony first party titles are that important 😂. Capcom bangers putting up numbers on PC because a few Sony ports lmao. Let's just ignore how Capcom games were doing great on PC before Sony started porting their games.

Sony games aren't even the most popular on their own platform, the majority of console owners don't give a shit about exclusives.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

Probably Samus or Bayo. Not too interested in video game stories, but I enjoy their characterization, I like that they're "gamey" and most importantly I like the games they lead.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

No. If I want some porn I'll watch some porn. Not interested in watching digital puppets get it on. Surely not paying for it lmao

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts
@texasgoldrush said:

Tactics allows you to create busted characters and cheese the game.

It sure does, can add that to the pile if you like. 🤷‍♂️

Still an odd retort, it's the only one of the bunch that even scratches tactical depth.

You claimed FF16 is shallow and lacks tactical depth. I'm saying that's the series regardless of battle system type.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

@Chutebox: Yes, good talk.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts
@Chutebox said:
@texasgoldrush said:

And its shallow. The combat has no real tactical depth.

😅

He aint wrong. Problem with his argument, it applies to the rest of the series as well. The turn based/atb games only rarely required you activate a brain cell during some of their late game optional bosses.

Can't be out here pretending FF fans were actually playing these games for tactical depth, least not in the mainline games. Final Fantasy Tactics, sure, but none of the numbered titles.

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

@last_lap said:

This coming from a guy who calls himself solidbuttcheaks🤦‍♂️

Exactly, that's when you know it's dire. A guy named solidbuttcheaks telling you to step your game up.

Reflect on that. 🙏

Avatar image for SolidButtCheakS
SolidButtCheakS

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By SolidButtCheakS
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

Just Cause lmao. This is like entering a sneaker junkie chat and name dropping Payless Shoes as the goat