I wouldn't be upset if we were getting all of Square-Enix's RPGs as well, but we're not. Doesn't the 360 already have 2 RPGs? And we have none? And now they are getting FOUR more? I can understand if Square-Enix wants more money, but they can make even more money if they release them all for us as well. They lose customers than gain by doing the move they did.
[QUOTE="Marksman2200"]If they do release it for the PS3 it will be like what they did for The Orange Box, the Ps3 will get no support.Generic_Dude
Don't be so negative. Even if the frame rate dips a little here and there, you won't notice because zombies move slow anyway. Besides, super-slow zombies are better than none at all, right? Right?
Actually, these are all super-fast zombies. It may be one of the reasons I won't get it--the second you have to reload your weapon, you will get surrounded, yeah, not so fun.
Apparently, "The Last Guy" game is supposed to be a zombie game, but creates the map area out of Google Earth. What does this mean? This means it could be an overhead zombie game that could take place anywhere that is real, even your own neighborhood. I don't know how detailed it would be, or if they plan on rendering the whole world somehow, but this would be pretty innovative if it actually turns out to be like what I read. The graphics wouldn't matter that much, but it would be fun going anywhere in the world to kill zombies, especially co-op. The video doesn't explain this, really, so hopefully what I've read otherwise is true.
In the demo, in the Gold Rush games, you have to keep moving no matter if you are defending or attacking. Even as a sniper I would stay in the back of the unit as the squad leader, but I had to keep moving forward because the bases keep moving after taking each over. I wanted to go prone, but some of the grass is high enough to hide in a crouch otherwise.
Maybe they should use their time more wisely and finish developing the game instead of wasting away to delay the game to make fun of another product they are trying to compete with. I want to play the game, but I'll just end up hating it if it is just as immature as the advertising.
I don't remember if the Master Marksman is the one wandering outside of Anvil, I haven't played as an archer for over a year, but sometimes the characters do adventure out in the wilderness for animals and skins, I saw a couple characters doing that last night.
Ok, the game's graphics is 4 years old, but that's not the point. It looks and sounds fun. So, PS3 users have to wait years for a zombie game, just one. RE5 might get delayed again, then what? We needed Dead Rising, and its sequel, and we need this. Yeah, I could get it for my PC, but I feel like all these games are getting ripped away from the new PS3 I just bought just because the developers are slow; they admitted it. And where's our RPG's? They're giving them all to the 360 because they want to take the easy route and just make money. I used to look up to game developers, but now they just want to do what's the easiest instead of what is best for the consumers. I'm going to school for game development and I won't take the easy route for nothing.
It had a cool concept, but the overall game just didn't deliver, it happens all the time, even for movies. You can see hints of this when they send someone from PR that seems overly-excited about every little thing in the game. Remember that guy they let curse at E3? The reviews came out so quickly, I doubt this actually made a lot of money.
Log in to comment