Tom Clancy sold his name to Ubisoft like a decade ago. He had no control over the games they put under his name, so I don't see why they'd have issues using it posthumously
@yamilvirginio @Swedish_Chef @bmart970 @tccavey2 @Saltd you say that as if they're trying to indoctrinate you in some way through their reviews. Why, because she said the game objectified women that you think she's trying to support feminism? Who cares? Like honestly, it's words on the internet, it's not important.
@bmart970 @tccavey2 @Saltd Yeah and there's no reason to petition to fire someone because the number on a review wasn't what some people thought it should be. It's stupid. Johnny had it right, if it's entertaining to you you don't need to have your entertainment validated by a review. Your entertainment doesn't decrease if the game is given a 9/10.
I love your show, but I honestly think your show contributes to the vitriol in the comments. People are often spewing garbage just so they could possibly see themselves 'immortalized' on Feedbackula.
@aaronpr0n SW:TOR is making tons of money, they have no reason to shut it down. WAR, however, never went F2P and didn't have an insanely lucrative cash shop like TOR does.
Swedish_Chef's comments