[QUOTE="SyrupNinja"]Well I am selling my PS3, Way to **** over retail fans Sony you arogant @$$wipes.SilverSterlsfakeboy confirmed. What do you mean?
SyrupNinja's forum posts
What is wrong with 2nd. I understand the hate of 1 because aside from the Racing and the last fight it was terrible... **** Jar Jar Binks he makes me want to jump off a bridge.really you guys liked episode 1 more then 2? I had no idea...
BlackDevil99
anyway looks like Empire still wins in a landslide
dcelw540 made a good point to fanboys who bash Halo 4 because Bungie is not making it. I am listening to him and I am not GrannyGoat, nor do I even know that user. I am a new user just like you were at some point.[QUOTE="SyrupNinja"][QUOTE="Desmonic"] Don't bother. That is just someone's alt to bash/troll.High probability that it is from the dude in my sig lol dcelw540
Thank you for listening :) It's just so hard for users to get along, The last of us could be great and I hope it is but you have to treat every game equally until you played it or have enough evidence to conclued your opnion and this game has very little detail and no gameplay at the moment, the info they gave sounds good but we need a lot more info until I can give it my offical opinion :)
Yeah I guess you are right, there is a slight chance that The Last of Us will be good and I guess I should wait for more information and keep an open mind even though what I have seen so far is terrible. There are sleeper hits and I did not think Xenoblade would be good because it was on one of the worst pieces of hardware relative to its competition I have seen (the Wii).[QUOTE="SyrupNinja"]2nd had the best acting. The original trilogy had terrible acting (not a popular thing to say but whatever).theone86
Obviousw troll is obvious.
Luke I am your father, NOOOOOOO, Thats impooosssible, NOOOOOOO! In the 2nd one the acting was much better. The third had worse dialogue than the originals by far I give you that. The 3rd movie was cringe worthy at times. The first one was not amazing either but the 2nd was the best. The ambeince, plotline, and the main downpoint was the cliffhanger but all starwars have those except the last one and that one is flawed for many other reasons. I would rank them 2, 4 , 5, 3, 6, 1[QUOTE="SyrupNinja"]2nd had the best acting. The original trilogy had terrible acting (not a popular thing to say but whatever).theone86
Obviousw troll is obvious.
Luke I am your father, NOOOOOOO, Thats impooosssible, NOOOOOOO! In the 2nd one the acting was much better. The third had worse dialogue than the originals by far I give you that. The 3rd movie was cringe worthy at times. The first one was not amazing either but the 2nd was the best. The ambeince, plotline, and the main downpoint was the cliffhanger but all starwars have those except the last one and that one is flawed for many other reasons. I would rank them 2, 4 , 5, 3, 6, 1
Log in to comment