i'll give it 7.5 rating, only because of bad gameplay, bad control, lots of bugs, bad audio sound, bad graphic's, bad online, bad mission, bad free roam, bad city, and the only good thing about the game is physic and story,i still like the game but hate it when compare it to Burnout.jojo198
wow....just wow....did you even play the game? It definately has great graphics, great missions and free roam, great city.
9/10 for me with SA getting a 9.5/10. SA's story was better and I loved how it went along very well, I didn't like how they burnt your apt down twice in GTA IV. Also, SA had some jokes missions thrown in as well as some awesome ones like robbing a bank and stuff.
The only thing I think PSN needs to update as a priority is the ability to invite friends through XMB....would make playing online so much easier. Other than that I think the rest are just cool add-ons.
[QUOTE="TheSystemLord1"]u had high hopes for games that anyone could have told you was going to turn out pretty averageSymphonycometh
Bull corn. These games were highly anticipated as next gen titles. Game Informer started reporting on the SW game like 2 years ago. Haze was also supposed to be one of the big exclusives for PS3. If you ask me, Reistance 2 is just another Gears of War clone, FPS are all alike and average.
Bioshock spits on this logic.
Gears is not a FPS and is nothing at all like Resistance....
lol i dont get it either man, like Assassin's Creed is EXACTLY like Mercs2, but w/ swords. repetitive, bad story, and buggy. i like both these games, and i think ones overrated, and ones underrated. theyre average games, and if you like those games then review it, and prove them wrong man. Berserkerz
Assassins Creed has FAR better graphics and a FAR better story. It is repetetive but if you're a casual gamer like me it's a great game.
Log in to comment