If you think about it, games have been tailored to guys, but there are a host of games out there (if not almost all of them) that are fun for girls too.
[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Sure, forget speaking and communication barbarian. TheManOfChoice
Who said anything about speaking and communication being left out? Spanking should not be used as the only punishment, but if the kid isn't listening, spanking makes them listen. When I was a kid, I did something bad. I was told not to do it again. I did it again. I was yelled at. I did it again. I was spanked. I didn't do it again.
So when they grow up, they will do something and keep on doing it until someone hits them............
I will spank if need be.
Yes I was spanked.
The pacifists need to learn a thing or two. Nothing can make a kid learn faster than a good spanking, especially if the child has done wrong multiple times doing the same thing.
TacticalElefant
It will make them learn to stop or they'll get a beating, not why it's "wrong" or why they shouldn't do it.
You could try all you want to explain to a 3 or 4 year old why not to do something, and do you expect them to understand the ramifications of what they are doing? Let's take for instance a child whom constantly jumps around on the back of a couch repeated times after being told not to do so. Now let's yell at him and try to explain to him the qualities of newtonian physics to him if he was to fall head first, possibly breaking/crushing his spine. Now let's try the "no!" then spank theory.............
I think you could've found a better example than a kid jumping on the couch:|
Messing with electrical outlets or equipement, being argumentive (this was a severe problem with me as a child), consistently troublesome over the same issue or occasion, being inconsiderate, etc, etc.
[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Sure, forget speaking and communication barbarian. X360PS3AMD05
Who said anything about speaking and communication being left out? Spanking should not be used as the only punishment, but if the kid isn't listening, spanking makes them listen. When I was a kid, I did something bad. I was told not to do it again. I did it again. I was yelled at. I did it again. I was spanked. I didn't do it again.
So when they grow up, they will do something and keep on doing it until someone hits them............
I will spank if need be.
Yes I was spanked.
The pacifists need to learn a thing or two. Nothing can make a kid learn faster than a good spanking, especially if the child has done wrong multiple times doing the same thing.
TacticalElefant
It will make them learn to stop or they'll get a beating, not why it's "wrong" or why they shouldn't do it.
You could try all you want to explain to a 3 or 4 year old why not to do something, and do you expect them to understand the ramifications of what they are doing? Let's take for instance a child whom constantly jumps around on the back of a couch repeated times after being told not to do so. Now let's yell at him and try to explain to him the qualities of newtonian physics to him if he was to fall head first, possibly breaking/crushing his spine. Now let's try the "no!" then spank theory.............
Spanking doesn't entail abuse, except maybe to freaking hippie. Even so, if it is "abuse", a bit of abuse in this case seems alot better than a possibly dead or injured child, simply because the parent was afraid that a little light corperal punishment. Once a child reaches an age of being able to understand (for some it's early on, others much later) then full explanation of such will be more useful. When I was younger I was spanked when I did things repeatedly or knew that I was doing something wrong. And it wasn't abusive at all, nor was it the "bend over knee" kind either, if I got caught, it was an immediate "WHAP" to the butt from my mom. My dad never spanked me lol.
The pacifists need to learn a thing or two. Nothing can make a kid learn faster than a good spanking, especially if the child has done wrong multiple times doing the same thing.
Well yes SMG is definetly the best looking game so far and the most impressive too for what it's doing as well. It hints to have some normal maps which is a nice feature. One game nobody mentioned was Dewy's Adventure, as the entire game is ok looking, but it is the first and currently the only Wii game to employ normal mapping.
The Wii has alot of potential to do some amazing stuff, hell the GC did too. The GC's real limit for doing a game like this was the amount of usable RAM. The GC had 24 MB of truly usable RAM for games (the other 16 was dedicated Disc buffer and Sound memory only). The Wii has 24+64 MB total. That's plenty of space, almost 3 times what the PS2 had and even still games like Monster Hunter and Shadow of the Colossus were done quite decently. Take into account the actual graphical horsepower as well, and you have a machine much better suited to long distance rendering with good graphics than either the GC, PS2, and probably the Xbox as well. Basically I expect MH3 to be graphically similar in terms of polygon models as the PS2 MHs, but with better textures, draw distance, and hopefully some bump or normal mapping (would look great for monsters!) and some shadowing/lighting to give real bearing of how big some of the monsters really are. There is alot of potential here, ALOT more than the PS2.
Log in to comment