Blame your fellow lemming TheTrystero024. For the record I didn't start Hardware discussions on here. Its all about the games.Stabby2486
If it's all about the games then the devs can make good ones without learning how to code for the Cell. And I'm not a lemming, I own a Gamecube, a PS2, a N64, and a DS.
You said that there are no worthy games on the 360 besides GeOW, I said you're wrong. I said that the PS3 is the one that is having that problems. Then you turned this into a hardware comparison. You're right about one thing though....."it's all about games" And so far, the 360 has lots of games for us to play .........AAA, AA or flops......it doesn't matter. So you're wrong about the 360 lacking games....... Blame this on your hatred on the 360 because you're trying to change the subjct into games (where the 360 is doing a good job). You're trying to make it seem like it lacks games.......which backfired on you. I am through arguing with a blind fanboy............... I am out, I am going to do something worthy.....like actually PLAYING A GAME.
[QUOTE="iwo4life"]How about some games? Isn't it all about games? Since R6:Vegas its all about Flop Planet, Flopdown, Major League Flop 2K7, NBA Homeflop and Def Jam: Flop. Not too impressive for a system that is supposed to be so superior with that big 1 year lead on the competition. Of course its not all the systems fault but the fault of the developers.iwo4life
Umm, Didn't Rainbow Six Vegas come out after GeoW?
There fixed for you. Doesn't make it any better. To the other poster. Yes they were hyped. You must have missed the 30 threads about how superior the 360 versions of all those underlined games were over the PS3. Even if just 1 person hyped them they are considered a flop. This is SW.
You still forgot GRAW2, and it's not like the other 2 are doing any better at the moment. This time of year has never been that great when it comes to game releases.
MS never promised something like "our console would be 2x stronge than the Xbox 1.5 out of the gate" which never really happened because PS3 and 360 games are pretty close in graphics. Dual 1080p, 120 fps, and 4D gaming were never promised to us by some crazy execs. Games are promised to us. So far there are a lot of games to play for the 360. So I don't know what this fanboy is babbling about 360 lacking games besides GeOW. Sony promised you a lot of crazy things.....don't apply it to us. MS promised you every game would be 720p and 4X FSAA. That has not been delivered. Dual 1080p was never promised. It was an early design spec. That other garbage was a mis interpretation because of a language barrier and were made by 1 man who is no longer in charge of anything. Your whole argument is based on that old tired rhetoric. Get some new material. The fact is, we still have games to play wether on 720p and 4X FSAA or not. The fact is Kutaragi blasted the 360 for being inferior to the PS3. Guess what, it is not that much powerful than the 360. Sony promised you that you would have a superior console....so far they haven't delivered. Some 360 promises are broken, but they are not as ridiculous as Sony's. So I am just going to funnel it into one argument, since both parties broke their promises. Sony promised that the PS3 is going to be 2x more powerful.....yet there's no evidence supports it. They said that the PS3 is going to be better than the competition in its contents and its specs. So where is the contents? RFOM? That's it? Old material or not....this doesn't validate that the 360 lacks games. This doesn't make gaming on the PS3 better than the 360, like Sony promised. To truly make better games than 10 hour TPS and generic tactical shooters take time. Here is an example of what I mean: LINK "On a Pentium 4 HT running at 3.4 GHz, this algorithm is able to check 24-million edges per second. On the Cell, at the end of our optimization, we achieved a performance of 538-million edges per second. This is an impressive result, but came at the price of an explosion in code complexity. While the algorithm in Listing One fits in 60 lines of source code, our final algorithm on the Cell measures 1200 lines of code." It is hard to program for but once the devs wrap their head around the Cell it will blow the 360 away. The Cell isn't something that is going to get fully tapped on day one.Then why are you going to make crazy promises to gamers about how superior your console to the 360 is if you're not going to deliver when you launched you're product. I am not even arguing that the 360 is stronger than the PS3. So far, the games on both consoles are pretty much the same, with some PS3 games looking a little bit better in some areas. So you're trying to say that only FPS and tactical shooters are only good games on the 360? You really need to take off your fanboy goggles off. I know that the PS3 is only in its 6th month, but the 360, although in it's second year, the devs have still not maximized the console's potential. Sony promised you better gaming........so where are the games and the "leaps and bounds ahead" graphics. If their console is so much powerful than they claimed to be, launch games or not, we should be able to notice the difference. If it is going to make you feel better, I am going to say that the 360 lacks games..........even though it doesn't. While you're trying to fool yourself and make yourself feel better by arguing that there are no other worthy games for the 360, other people are playing their games on their Wiis and 360's. People are enjoying their console instead of trying to persuade other people how their console is better on teh internetz.
So now for a game to be hyped it needs a sticky? That has never stopped people from declaring anything that gets lower than a 9 a flop on SW. I would suggest that you post XBL stuff in the 360 forum if you don't want a bunch of opposition to it. If I posted "Casino Royal trailer on PSN." I would be eaten alive by xbot fanboys. Stabby2486
No, it needs a sticky for me to know the score prediction average, since there wasn't I need a link. If you don't have one get off my thread.
"But...but...this is teh SW. I don't need to use logic or evidence."
[QUOTE="iwo4life"]How about some games? Isn't it all about games? Since R6:Vegas its all about Flop Planet, Flopdown, Major League Flop 2K7, NBA Homeflop and Def Jam: Flop. Not too impressive for a system that is supposed to be so superior with that big 1 year lead on the competition. Of course its not all the systems fault but the fault of the developers.iwo4life
Umm, Didn't Rainbow Six Vegas come out after GeoW?
There fixed for you. Doesn't make it any better. To the other poster. Yes they were hyped. You must have missed the 30 threads about how superior the 360 versions of all those underlined games were over the PS3. Even if just 1 person hyped them they are considered a flop. This is SW.
You still forgot GRAW2, and it's not like the other 2 are doing any better at the moment. This time of year has never been that great when it comes to game releases.
MS never promised something like "our console would be 2x stronge than the Xbox 1.5 out of the gate" which never really happened because PS3 and 360 games are pretty close in graphics. Dual 1080p, 120 fps, and 4D gaming were never promised to us by some crazy execs. Games are promised to us. So far there are a lot of games to play for the 360. So I don't know what this fanboy is babbling about 360 lacking games besides GeOW. Sony promised you a lot of crazy things.....don't apply it to us. MS promised you every game would be 720p and 4X FSAA. That has not been delivered. Dual 1080p was never promised. It was an early design spec. That other garbage was a mis interpretation because of a language barrier and were made by 1 man who is no longer in charge of anything. Your whole argument is based on that old tired rhetoric. Get some new material. The fact is, we still have games to play wether on 720p and 4X FSAA or not. The fact is Kutaragi blasted the 360 for being inferior to the PS3. Guess what, it is not that much powerful than the 360. Sony promised you that you would have a superior console....so far they haven't delivered. Some 360 promises are broken, but they are not as ridiculous as Sony's. So I am just going to funnel it into one argument, since both parties broke their promises. Sony promised that the PS3 is going to be 2x more powerful.....yet there's no evidence supports it. They said that the PS3 is going to be better than the competition in its contents and its specs. So where is the contents? RFOM? That's it? Old material or not....this doesn't validate that the 360 lacks games. This doesn't make gaming on the PS3 better than the 360, like Sony promised.
Log in to comment