[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"][QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="SolidGame_basic"]The problem with that argument is that the earlier games already set the precedent for later ones which makes it harder to rate higher. Same thing with Soul Calibur 4, which obviously is better than Soul Calibur but Soul Calibur was new back then, and 4 wasn't that innovative except for online.SolidGame_basic

good damn point!

Not really. Soul Calibur 4 isn't nearly as good as Soul Calibur was.

well, its debatle I guess, I love this game. so we are back to square one. but I still agree with tony harrison.

It's not debatable! None of the Soul Calibur sequels have lived up to the glory of the original Soul Calibur.

I can't think of any reason why anyone would want to debate it.

That's my point, hence a lower score....

The same can be said for Metal Gear Solid 4.

By the way... Mushroom Men? Really?NAPK1NS

Mushroom Men looks like an awesome platformer.

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="SolidGame_basic"]The problem with that argument is that the earlier games already set the precedent for later ones which makes it harder to rate higher. Same thing with Soul Calibur 4, which obviously is better than Soul Calibur but Soul Calibur was new back then, and 4 wasn't that innovative except for online.LEGEND_C4A

good damn point!

Not really. Soul Calibur 4 isn't nearly as good as Soul Calibur was.

well, its debatle I guess, I love this game. so we are back to square one. but I still agree with tony harrison.

It's not debatable! None of the Soul Calibur sequels have lived up to the glory of the original Soul Calibur.

I can't think of any reason why anyone would want to debate it.

Interesting theory, but wholly untrue.asylumni

Remakes and spin-offs don't count! :lol:

I'm talking about the main series. But if you need to unload the dumpster truck in order to make your fanboyish point then who am I to stop you?

[QUOTE="SolidGame_basic"]The problem with that argument is that the earlier games already set the precedent for later ones which makes it harder to rate higher. Same thing with Soul Calibur 4, which obviously is better than Soul Calibur but Soul Calibur was new back then, and 4 wasn't that innovative except for online.LEGEND_C4A

good damn point!

Not really. Soul Calibur 4 isn't nearly as good as Soul Calibur was.

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="sam280992"]What is this supposed to prove?

sam280992

For the purpose of System Wars, that Metal Gear Solid 4 is the lowest rated MGS game of all time.

Well for the purpose of System Wars, We only use Gamespot scores for its status... And it got a ten...

It stings doesn't it?

Not really. Realistically very few people use Gamespot as their sole provider of reviews. In the real world, Super Mario Galaxy is the second highest ranked game of all time by reviewers, and Metal Gear Solid 4 is sixty ninth.

By the way, make a point! Otherwise you are breaking the rules, read the sticky!!!!

You must provide an opinion!

clembo1990

This thread makes a point based on facts that is open for discussion, so it doesn't need baseless opinions.

Read the sticky.

What is this supposed to prove?

sam280992

For the purpose of System Wars, that Metal Gear Solid 4 is the lowest rated MGS game of all time.

just to put things in perspective:

Most anticipated Wii game - Mushroom Men: The Spore Wars

TruestGamer

That's *my* most anticipated Wii game, yes.