[QUOTE="BossPerson"]except for all the times they don't http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/25/study-obama-drone-deathsBossPerson
I'm aware of the prblems. Just means we need more time to perfect this relatively new technology.Maybe we can zoom in real close and see how big their beards are before we kill them? maybe.
I was thinking since this tech is only like 3 years old, and since in the course of human history, this is the first time humans can fight in combat, without actually being there, and I would much rather a robot have the potential to die than our soilder. and given the high inaccuraty, yeah, I'd say there's room for improvement, and given how science has been making strides in recent yeaqrs in robotics, fight and computers, yes I do expect the technology to get much much better. You don't get better without actual field tests though.
Obama's poverty enabling pro-welfare activism and his anti-drug crusade are racist.Do you have something against people on welfare?in his ideal somalianisk world, they'd be starving in the street.
[QUOTE="Vuurk"] Can you blame them? Thousands of citizens in their country have been murdered by drone strikes under the Obama administration. Also, I think a much more interesting graph would be one that includes an option for neither candidate. BossPerson
They're killing terrorists with those derp.except for all the times they don't http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/25/study-obama-drone-deathsI'm aware of the prblems. Just means we need more time to perfect this relatively new technology.
Can you blame them? Thousands of citizens in their country have been murdered by drone strikes under the Obama administration. Also, I think a much more interesting graph would be one that includes an option for neither candidate. Vuurk
Log in to comment