Fairly certain that the kids who's never heard of WW1 or even WW2, isn't exactly old enough to be playing a 18+ game, nor a 16+ game.

Oh Mechanist, I thought AntAgonizer and I defeated you in Fallout 3.

Both of them are much better then the dull and generic "man with gun standing facing you on the cover" that they actually went with.

With that said B since it seems to be more shooter based type gameplay then horror and a throwback to the first one.

Had it focused more on horror like Doom 3 did I would've said Cover A would be more suited.

It is kinda a good thing this was discovered in the Beta when they can fix it before the launch, rather then after the launch of the game.

Afterall that is the whole point with Beta's, to locate exploits, bugs and glitches and then fix them.

"It is because of the 1-to-1 recreation and the way the pandemic has [happened]. Basically, everything has been hit and there are no more resources because everyone tried to get out. There is no more gasoline in the cars, there is no traffic, you're on foot."

Hold on, The story based reason is one would need to walk to the different districts since there's no vehicle transport?

So what?

A better excuse involving story would be that the bridges were destroyed and the tunnels flooded in an attempt to contain the pandemic, not "You would have to walk there and that takes time"

Guess his supposed "Vacation" is over, ey Konami?

Going to be interesting to see what Kojima comes up with now that he's got more freedom.

While I'm quite certain this is a project gone wrong, I'd agree the ones who donated ought to know what their money went towards. Are they legally or morally obligated to provide them refunds, perhaps. They likely generate enough revenue to allow it and Kickstarter probably has records of who gave how much. I also dislike how they've thrown the developer under the bus when they could've stood up and taken partial blame. And this from someone who watches their video's often. They've handled this poorly and In my opinion the project was doomed from the start.

With that said I hope this makes people open their eyes to Kickstarter and perhaps even "early releases", it's risky and you're giving money towards something that in a few cases are finished, most often are canceled or left in development cause the developers realize that finishing the product is a loss. This was one of those cases and while I partially feel bad for those that gave ten grand towards the project, I can't help but think " They can't have been so naive to think there was no risk involved"

If it however turns out people are that naive to Kickstarter projects then either there needs to be given contracts that ensure full or partial refund if the project fails or we're simply not ready to take the role of a investor and take the gamble. And since I highly doubt the contract route would be implemented then I hope this stands as something to have jerked the naive awake.

Seems my question, at least what my jumbled mess of words meant, Got answered.

Hoping for base attacks, soldiers betraying you and overall damage to your abilities to respond to the Alien threat.

My question.

If you choose to ignore the EXALT group entirely, will it affect the outcome of the campaign story?

Or rather does EXALT have any influence at all on the Campaign story or is it just another group you might fight as you progress?

if it wasn't for the rapid respawning checkpoints, malaria and very weak and difficult to follow story, I'd say Far Cry 2 was fantastic, Instead it's pretty good but frustrating at times.