@immortality20 Did you really say Spiderman 3 was good?

OMG... that just invalidated your opinions, whatsoever, regarding Spiderman

I like how the public exchange comments with Spidey... that's one of the reasons why Spiderman 2 was so awesome and Spidey 3 and Web of Shadows sucked...

As long as you don't charge me the price of a game with a 40 hour long campaign then I'm cool with it

Stop crying... the bullet time system is absolutely perfect...

It won't affect anyone unless the enemy is directly in the line of sight of the guy who starts the bullet time...

In other words, the guy who starts the bullet time mode has to have his aiming reticule over the enemy - if there are any enemies near the targetted one, the player can quickly change the aim and shoot those extra 2 or 3 guys too...

Next, the bullet time system doesn't work unless you've earned it (a bit like a killstreak to put it in terms of COD). The bullet time feature is available in 3 different speeds (each one drains the bullet time meter more based on the speed) and either way, these bursts of bullet time will only work for around 5 seconds tops... this being said, this feature could only hinder noobs but the MP seems pretty straight forward so I don't see how this would give some an advantage as it should be pretty easy to earn the bullet time feature.

Sell the games for less then - it's not rocket science...

Nobody's gonna buy a 3 hour game for £50/$65 - remember back when the highest a game would be was £30 tops for the PS2?

funny thing is how the expansion maps are ACTUALLY decent and shoulda been in the actual game from the very start itself...

Personally, I'm tired of the COD series, but I got MW3 anyway. First of all, I prefer it over BF3 for obvious reasons. One being Spec Ops. Specs Ops is.... genuinely fun. I actually enjoy doing missions with a buddy, and although people argue that MW3 is fast-paced action and not realistic, there is some sort of realism to the Specs Ops and campaign modes. They offer some sort of planning to complete so I enjoy that sort of a challenge this mode offers. Survival mode is nothing special but a nice addition nevertheless. Multiplayer wise - let's admit it - it's just more or a less like a map pack created for MW2. I see no sort of change to the multiplayer. Perhaps the gun leveling system is a good change, but otherwise, it's the same experience all over again. Seeing as COD is famous for it's MP experience, it's disappointing this time around. However, the MW campaigns have always been great. And this time, we once again get a great campaign although it's incredibly short. Overall, MW3 is more my thing cause of the campaign and Spec Ops. Although I despise the MP to a certain extent, I still play it frequently. However, BF3's campaign is poor and only the multiplayer experience is somewhat entertaining (although I don't see much of a leap forward from BFBC2). Graphically too, the game resembles BFBC2 - only PC versions have that 'wow' factor. So yeah... just an unbiased opinion for those who're not sure on which title to check out...