@IanNottinghamX: That keeps me thinking, in fact. The idea (maybe) is getting a foot into the low-tier market (offices, casual gaming). Or just spending R&D on low end cards so they can learn more about optimization which would help with their high end cards. Or just to cut the market more for AMD...
I guess this cards exist for a reason, But yes; for acceptable gaming you can go with a 1060, like you said...
@TigerClaw: Obviously those cards are not going to be bought by people that want to play at "ultra" settings, but for those that can't afford/don't care about graphics and performance. Those people also exists, you know ;)
@alien33: In Germany MSI's 1080 is the cheapest, and that's 699€ ($768) NO WAY you can get one for 600€ like they claim, unless it is from somebody selling it second hand in a desperate need for money.
@kvally: And that Gave a lot of Sony games a low Score. I'm not going to start a cherry-picking here with you. But Each reviewer's opinion is independent and just that: an opinion. Keep that in mind.
@kyelo: Except I agreed with this score based on what we got in previous games and what the reviewer got from this one in his opinion; which is what every review in Gamespot is, according to their own review procedure acknowledged by themselves. So no claim here, please read my post again (Fully, not only the first sentece) and the review up there and think for a moment if you are not understanding what you want to understand over what I actually said.
So no; far from meaningless. Talking about "bias" on "personal opinions" on the other hand...
Warlord_Irochi's comments