@Vylsith /facepalm

I was talking about the noticeable quality difference in THOSE GAMES RELEASED IN BOTH MACHINES. Like Resident Evil 4, for example. How did you come up with me saying something close to "Gamecube was more popular than PS2"?

Read a comment if you are going to asnwer to it instead of making up stuff, really...

Honestly thinking, No game designer/journalist is gonna menction "Texture quality". Because it's not the same 1080p 60FPS in a next gen game than a HD ps2 port; in this last case even last gen consoles could do it.

Looks nice. But yet again, Sniper Elite 2 looked nice too and in the end it was not that spectacular.

@nameaprice @WolfgarTheQuiet @Bellum_Sacrum *YOU'RE
(oops, sorry)

@chrisnacca Congratulations. I guess your life has some meaning now :)

@UNCStriker88 Like in the PS2 Era with multiplatform games released on it and Gamecube. Nothing new but you know...

@daviz88 1080p is 1080p. Don't make up stuff, man.

Obviously it will depend on the tools and the coding tricks of each studio. You only have to compare Games released in 2005 and their sequels in the same machine a few years later.

Still, Their problem (Microsoft) is not giving good tools to developers. Last generation MS was giving a lot of tools to the studios and had a very good first two years. Sony barelly gave any tools and the first year of PS3 was quite poor.

So... now Sony learns from their mistakes and Microsoft stops doing something that was right from thebegining to fall in a mistake he already saw in his competitor...

It's quite ridiculous.

@SipahSalar /facepalm
And The Walking Dead a ripoff from "George Romero's Day of the Dead", why not?

Not sure if I want to see a review that may spoil some jump-scares. ^^;