@mikster_rdy: "I enjoyed every single second of the game"

Then what is the problem?

"Surprised they call this glorified tech demo cr*p a remake"

Didn't you say you enjoyed it? now you call it crap?

"Square Enix hasn't exactly released good stuff in the last years"

Yes you still bought the almost impossible to pre-order the day after it was announced 300€ edition and, somehow, you never read that this game is a 3-parts one when they said it shortly after the announcement?

Yeah, we tooootally believe you...

@cldmstrsn1: "I beat it around 28 hours taking my time"

Doubt it.

@5tu88sy: Would not happen if people wouldn't be so outraged by a number in a website.

@daidochus: The numbers that Fortnite rise for this people don't exactly spell "desperation". Where did you get that info from?

@Kisalon: 100GB is not huge, not even worth an article. Bit this writer is notorious for writing mostly clicmbait stories.

@cetaepsilon: I believe they tried to keep it updated by re-writing the canon so that the nuclear bombing was started with China instead of Russia when Fallout 3 came out. Been a while, so I may be wrong here.

Well... this was a good chance to fix the deeper problems the game has and I'm not sure if they will ever have another one.

@cboye18: That's the thing with GaaS. A lot of companies have projects that follow that model and they are usually tied to the companie's reputation. Let the game die as soon as it flops and you will hardly be able to sell the next one. If you also add cases like this, with people who have paid for a "premium" service of sorts, and may face even worse backslash.
A failed GaaS is a trap; they are stuck with it. The only option they have is to try and fix it, as hopeless as it may sound sometimes

Poor reviews, but it got quite a loyal group of followers. In the end that's what matters in the long run. Glad for them.

Division 2 improved a lot with the expansion so it's worth a check. Not sure if this discount will have any meaning, when not long ago it was down to 3$