@off3nc3: So people said about the first Destiny, and The Division, and Diablo III, and For Honor, and FFXIV and Rainbow Six Siege and look at them now.
Also Destiny managed to continue afloat since it had the shooting mechanics going for it; which were always quite good, so not "all possible features" as you believe.
@DeadManRollin: Maybe it's because a lot of people find them interesting and they buy them. I'm gong to guess that you are joking when you suggest that they don't keep making those games because they sell a lot.
@Litchie: Yeah, you tell them! tell to those dumb people how dumb they are for buying the games that they like. Oh, they are so dumb for liking what you don't like! You are smart, that's why you talk about an unreleased game that you haven't played. You go call others "suckers" for making their own choices! Because they are dumb, Unlike you; you're smart.
@nsa_protocol44: Sure, no question there. But I do expect to get something when I click on an article; not an empty shell of a text that says nothing relevant. That's were my complaint is :(
I though this article would mention some relevant event that is not a common development stage that every game goes through.
So I have to state: I regret this click. I entered on an article searching for relevant info a got nothing. Is this the kind of content that you want to offer in this website?
@lionheartssj1: All versions are solid, but PC receives the updates weeks in advance. Plus, PC has more cosmetic items, in case that you are interested in those.
Warlord_Irochi's comments