Modern Warfare 2 says hi.
more like modern warfare 1.5: mod pack edition Weird after the conference i thought i was watching a different game stop bashing it and wait for it to ship.Stop hyping it to the moon and wait for it to ship...fair?Wombatringo's forum posts
I don't know. I have the 360 version, and for myself I was disappointed in the direction that RE5 went with gameplay. All the bright-lit environments and infinite ammo thru the "store" between chapters...where did the survival horror element go? Does anyone remember the PS versions of RE that made you jump out of your chair when you had to use those last 8 pistol rounds you had on some monster? That to me was RE, and I'd love to see something like that again for my Wii, instead of a watered-down RE5 port. Just my opinion.
Although I could spend about 4 or 5 paragraphs embarassing you because of your flamebait/fanboyesque comments, I don't feel especially like getting modded today. Suffice it to say, this is one of the stupidest and most untrue comments I've ever read in SW. And that says a lot.10 years of the PC sucking. After 10 years they don't have a better shooter. Says it all.
CreepyBacon
The PC has so many great shooters to choose from, CS alone is considered by many to be better than anything found on consoles, and its still has a larger online community. Dispute that, if you can. Edit: Happy B-day CS, I can't play you in Iraq, but I'll be home soon, then its back to Dust 2 all day long!!!
well the PC tends to be excluded from the graphics comparison because it is not a regular console, it is on a whole different medium.
This. Then by this same token, we claim that games that are brought to the PC as well as the 360 are multi-plat, even though they are on a different medium? Makes no sense.I'm wondering how games on PC count against the 360 in terms of exclusives, but when the term "graphics king" is used, we exclude the PC from the equation entirely. This makes no sense. Its obvious that the PC will have better graphics. However, it seems more than convenient that the PC is included in some arguments when comparing 360 and PS3, but not in others. Hypocrisy? I think so.
What for? that thing is a horrible mess. Buy a PSP 3000. It has bigger screen, removable batteries and UMD slot.[QUOTE="Thunderdrone"][QUOTE="Wombatringo"]It does have a very impressive looking lineup coming. I just wish the damn PSPGo was cheaper so I could justify picking one up!Filthybastrd
PSP 3000 >>>>>>>>>> PSPGo indeed :)
3000 + 16 Gb memory stick and an extra battery = win.
I might do that, there's a 3000 bundle with Rock Band Unplugged that I might pick up. Can't wait for RE for PSP, that game needs to come out like, tomorrow.[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="Bewareoffalling"]Um, This time I did my homework. I looked it up on google news, Watched everything and yes, they are exclusive.TR800
Um, no they aren't. :|
Alan Wake
Splinter Cell: Conviction
They are console exclusive or do cows always run for the pc when they need help.This seems to me like the real issue at hand. The PC doesn't compete with consoles in the same arena. Its just generally accepted that the PC is better. But when it comes time to decide what exclusives are which, all of a sudden the multi-plat argument comes to the forefront. "oh its not exclusive, its also on the PC." These two games can't be played on any other console. When most threads are made, its a comparison between PS3 and 360 and their respective exclusive lineups. Since Microsoft decides to bring some of their games out onto a platform in which they have a huge stake in, being the main OS in PC, the 360 gets penalized for games not being 'exclusive'. Thats absurd.
Log in to comment