A game called Clintchers. It takes about 40 hours to get through 1 dungeon. I swear that game MASSIVE. It's on the PS Vita.

[QUOTE="YosemiteSam400"]

[QUOTE="Venom_Raptor"]

You sound like one of those do-gooders who do nothing but whine about something they feel is wrong. It's a game, if you don't like violent games, play something else.

Venom_Raptor

Oh, and I am a do-gooder that lifts.

That's pathetic. You think because I'm not turned away by pixelised violence, and expect realism when there is violence in games, that I have mental problems of something and have to vent out rage of some kind? Is that what you're implying? 

[QUOTE="YosemiteSam400"][QUOTE="Venom_Raptor"]

There's nothing wrong with violence in games. If GTA didn't allow you to kill pedestrians it'd be stupid. When I shoot someone in a game I expect blood. Developers aren't disturbed purely because they showcase violence strongly. 

Venom_Raptor

You sound like one of those do-gooders who do nothing but whine about something they feel is wrong. It's a game, if you don't like violent games, play something else.

Oh, and I am a do-gooder that lifts.

There's nothing wrong with violence in games. If GTA didn't allow you to kill pedestrians it'd be stupid. When I shoot someone in a game I expect blood. Developers aren't disturbed purely because they showcase violence strongly. 

Venom_Raptor

[QUOTE="YosemiteSam400"]

Lol. I've beaten Mass Effect 3, Red Dead, Skyrim and a plethora of modern games lately. Never said I didn't play modern games, friend.

 

Lol, those beat em ups you mentioned pretty much suck ass. Streets of Rage and Final Fight in general trounce them. Better yet, Batman Returns on the SNES is better. Oh, and the classic arcade beat em ups such as Caddillacs and Dinosaurs, Punisher, Knights of the Round, King of Dragons etc, all destroy those games that you mentioned. Oh boy, come on gramm, you can do better than that. Brawlers from the 90s obliterate the beat em ups out now. If you disagree, then I question your taste in games. Better yet, any 90s capcom/konami brawler is much better. Since you are in your 30s, I question if you just didn't play games from back then, if so, then I pity you friend.

 

I'm sorry, but Scott Pilgrim and Castle Crashers..... LOL!

 

JustPlainLucas

Pretty sure he's just trolling, and that replying to him is absolutely pointless.

ReddestSkies

Yeah... because all developers get to choose exactly what game they work on. They decide everything about their games, after all. Not the designers, or the publishers, or the marketing department. Just the developers. And they're all **** crazy.

 

Violent games get made because violent games sell. The industry is a business.

boredom_kills

Yes it does sell, makes you wonder about humanity and its double standards. Not only that, but the hypocrisy of it all.

[QUOTE="Byshop"]

[QUOTE="001011000101101"]"the best endings can be achieved with 5,000 military strength)." Wrong. After the Extended Cut, the best ending can be achieved at just 3100 EMS.001011000101101

Wrong. Even if you are talking about the Extended Cut updates, 3100 will get you the [spoiler] "Shepard Lives" [/spoiler] scene but you still need 4000 or better [spoiler] for more of the crew to survive the crash in the Destroy and Control endings [/spoiler] . Depending on which choices you made and [spoiler] whether or not you saved Anderson [/spoiler] you may also need an EMS higher than 3100 to get that final scene.

-Byshop

From the Mass Effect wiki: "Mass Effect 3: Extended Cut lowers the EMS required to achieve all possible endings from ~4000 to 3100." An EMS higher than 3100 won't add anything.