Many will hate me for saying this but I found Gears to be a better visual experience maybe because of artstyle. UT3 looks great but overall Gears takes my vote.OoSuperMarioO
It's weird that you say that because when I first played UT3, I thought they were trying to copy GoW's art style. It might have just been the map I was on (the one with the War of the Worlds robot in the demo), but it seemed like an fps version of Gears of War. Graphically, anyway.
And if you play it on Delta, you're pretty much just sneaking around using the camo the entire game. That might be why I didn't like it too much. I'm sure it's more fun if you can just run into town and punch people through shacks and punch over cars.
The only difference I've seen between the two games are the "sex scenes" which is really just a card with nude art on it. It can hardly be considered gratuitous. I have the EU version simply because I don't like the idea of playing or watching something that's been censored.
After playing both, I don't see what's great about Crysis other than it looking pretty. That said, get CoD4. The single player campaign is basically like being in a military drama, and the multiplayer isn't a lesser bf2 clone.
[QUOTE="Jinroh_basic"]lol...i hope you have fun with the game, mate, coz apparently politics and history aren't your strongest suit. Srinivassa
wat r u talking about. that was quoted strait from my colum in the new york times. you never heard of "the godless commies." you must be a brit. their all haf commie anyway.
Whoa whoa. Don't try to take the nytimes down with you.
Incredible gameplay? So many possibilities? Right. The game operates under the illusion of free roaming, but it's actually very linear. Most of the time you're presented with two options: Travel high or travel low. Other than the suit (which you find out isn't even really secret or rare since the koreans have a crapload of them), it's really just an ordinary fps.
It's pretty though, and that's what people seem to care most about.
Log in to comment