@joshrmeyer: I see your point, Josh. I just expressed an opinion sometimes confused by some gamers. As a hobby, I enjoy having the best experience possible. I'm the kind that plays a campaign once, and rarely again, because time is short and new experiences are what matters.
Following that trail, as most of my gaming experience is made of multiplataform titles, the Scorpio seems to give me the best experience, not just graphically, but its online network is also two steps ahead of the alternative.
I enjoy many PS exclusives as well and I'll keep playing them on my PS4. What could make me sad by playing every game on it is the feeling that the best experience is in another plataform and I was wasting my time.
@janejp: Scorpio provides the best experience for most of your gaming time. Think about it: 86% of games you play are multiplataform. Add MS exclusives if you want...
@khanwashere: But 86% of games you play are multiplataform. If you want the best gaming experience, then you'll play it on Scorpio. The system has every best multiplataform performance, plus MS exclusives, the best service and online network.
If you want the best, you want Scorpio. I'll keep PS4 myself just for a few exclusives I enjoy. Everything else is Scorpio.
@harlemsfinest27: Considering that 86% of games you play are multiplataform (and online), your choice for the best gaming experience is Scorpio and Live. Add MS exclusives if you want.
Bolivia has a point. Let's see if developers would make a game in USA, where its people love war, are weapon addictive, shoot children at schools, greatest drugs consumer and elect radicals for the presidency.
It's just like the rest of the world thinks about it. What about developers?
It seems that EA Access has already inspired new initiatives. Clearly there are two differences when compared to PSNow: 1 - download and not the problematic streaming; 2 - fundamentally provides games of the current generation, in addition to the previous one.
I think the idea is very interesting, depending on the gamer profile. For those who usually take about two/three weeks to complete a campaign, an annual subscription can cost the price of 2-3 games, but allows you to play dozens. Excellent initiative.
And some people still don't believe that Gamespot has become a biased site. Take a look at Metacritic. Gamespot has the worst numbers about most MS games. Coincidence? Not at all. Take a look at those new editors behavior at every show when talking about MS. Just check it out. And sometimes that's just ridiculous, like when talking about Quantum Break: "The game has many Alan Wake references and I don't enjoy that". "Have you played Alan Wake?" "No, never".
That's Gamespot new (?) standard. Not by chance many gamers abandoned it. Time to say goodbye.
Zicoroen's comments