My concern is about how fun it is. Maybe at first hour, when you're still learning about mechanics it is interesting. But then it seems to be really boring, repetitive gameplay with a new paint.

@letsgame82: Ok, I won't call you a kid if the expression hurts you. No problem. You can talk like an "adult" right now. I'm listening.

@Xristophoros: You want your console to have the worst service. That's a weird behavior, but maybe you're just delusional I hope. That seems choice is something you don't like to have. I can understand that for kids that need their mon to choose what they eat, but not for gamers. But your're better, as you know and recommend better plataforms that give functions that yours can't. That confession is nice. Evolving is the next step.

@letsgame82: Wrong again, kid.

1 - as I said before, crossplay had technical problems years ago and just a few initiatives could support it. Sony and MS did some trials. Just check games like Shadowrun on Xbox. But right now most problems are gone, but Sony fears it could lose consumers. Why? What else is better? Sony prefers blind sheep;

2 - online petition? C'mon. It's 2016 and it doesn't work, kid. I never heard about an Ark petition. Steam and MS have an oficial forum and consumers service that let you write anything you want and they answer what you ask. Take a look at backwards compability games list and MS answer. Sony should do something like that, but it won't;

3 - choice once again. You're not forced to buy an "in construction" game. But players must have a choice to try it if they want and developers have support to test their ideas before launch. By your logic, maybe more than 6 million players that support Ark right now are not having fun.

Choice and transparency. Something Sony doesn't give us.

@letsgame82: "On Playstation, gamers get to choose what feature they want aswell. Really? Which choices? Like the ones we're discussing about it isn't.

Crossplay over 10 years? It was just an incipent intiative, for a few insignificant games when the crossplay feature wasn't a technical standard. But now that it is, what does Sony fear? Why keep players blind about what is better outside its own ecosystem?

And early access is choice once again. If you don't want, just don't play it. But you should if you want. But Sony fears something.

Sony's greed is everywhere, The points discussed are all about that. And console prices are usually concerned about it's building plan, not greed exactly...

@Xristophoros: Take a look at VanquishRE's answer. I agree with him.

You confirmed Sony's fears again. .

1 - crossplay and "potential to reduce PS4 sales"? Why? How gaming together can reduce PS4 sales? What exactly will PS4 players discover that reduces PS4 attractiveness? And if it happens, is the player the one to be blind about it, or is it just a bad company behavior to keep gamers blind about the truth?

2 - is EA Access just like Games with Gold? Your logic is wrong by itself and an evidence about lack of choice on Sony's ecosystem;

3 - I'll summarize the point: players don't want to pay for games they own already and be forced to pay for something they don't want to;

4 - choice once again. You're not forced to buy an "in construction" game. But players must have a choice to try it if they want and developers have support to test their ideas before launch. By your logic, maybe more than 6 million players that support Ark right now are not having fun.

Choice is a nice thing and that's Sony's extremist behaviour makes it be called the new "gaming's Donald Trump". :)

If you start to enjoy gaming, every plataform, your frustration, fear and sadness shoud end. Be a gamer. Not a delusional fanboy.

@letsgame82: Let's summarize the point: on PC or Xbox, players can choose if they want a feature or not. They have a choice, even if some act against the company financial desire. Why Sony just don't let its players choose what is better for them? If EA access is bad, nobody will subscribe it, just like most of us don't subscribe PS Now and really desire to play our last gen games on our new consoles, free, just like our fellow Xbox friends do. Gamers choice is the point. Something that some - usually delusional fanboys - don't want to see. Sony's greed is more powerful than its consumers desires and works like a dictatorship. By the way, Sony is called Donald Trump of gaming right now... :)

@Scorch_22: Yes, just like Street Fighter V, Driveclub, Wonder, Fallout 4 etc...

@Xristophoros: Hypocrisy. Maybe you're delusional fanboy, but don't let it make you look like a moron. Remember Street Fighter 5, Fallout 4 etc.

@letsgame82: You said like a guy that thinks every gamer thinks like him. Me and many others want these features. Take a look at Sony forum and see by yourself. What is Sony's fear? Let PS players choose, like MS does with Xbox ones.

And you just confirmed the point: Sony's greed is awful and it thinks about itself only. Not about its delusional players.