_Muta / Member

Forum Posts Following Followers
8412 34 30

_Muta Blog

It's been a rough few days..... but it's time to pay my respect.

Ever since i heard the news, i haven't had the urge to watch wrestling at all. None, until i finally forced myself to watch Eddie vs. Super Crazy from RoH: The Era of Honor Begins. While the match wasn't all that great (***, IMO), it's good to know that all i have to do is pop in that show or a myriad of other shows/DVDs anytime i want to see him again.

I think it's safe to say that i've had enough time to fully digest this whole tragedy. Eddie Guerrero was one of my top 5 favorite wrestlers in the WWE today, as well as one of my top 10 favorites of all time. For the past few days, i've been a walking talking vacuum. I've barely talked to any of my friends. I've barely talked to anyone, period. The fact that a Pro-Wrestler/TV Character has made that much of an impression in my life is a true testament to his talent.

I'll admit, Eddie didn't really catch my attention up until 2000 when he jumped over to the E, mostly because i followed the E product more after 1996, believe it or not. When he debuted the whole Latino Heat gimmick, he immediately connected with me. The music was great, the angle with Chyna was great, his promos and catch phrases were great. I became the "Eddie Guerrero" of my little geeky group of wrestling buddies back then, as i'd constantly say "Ese", "Mamacita", "You want some Latino Heat?", and recite the theme song. My top 5 favorite Eddie matches would have to be Eddie vs. Mysterio - WCW HH 97, Eddie vs. Chris Benoit - Vengeance 03, Eddie vs. Dean Malenko - ECW 1995, Eddie vs. Edge - Smackdown, Fall 2002, and Eddie vs. Kurt Angle - WM XX.

I will definitely be picking up the new Eddie tribute shirt. Not only because all proceeds are going to the Guerrero family, but the fact that it's just a great shirt!

In closing, i was really moved by the RAW tribute. Fortunately, i got all my crying out the night before. However, i was extremely depressed throughout the entire show. I'm still slightly depressed as i type this. The tribute was so well done. It exceeded all my expectations, tenfold. Benoit, Batista, Chavo, and Mysterio breaking down like that was intense, to say the least. I could mention how momentarily annoyed i was by the fact that HHH and Stephanie talked after Benoit, etc., but the positives clearly outweighed that little negative. I still haven't come to grips with the fact that he's gone. However, i had an epiphany the other day - Eddie might be gone, but he didn't go with any regrets, whatsoever. It's not like we can really say "He could've been one of the all time greats, he had everything going for him", etc. The fact is, Eddie DID live up to his potential. He lived up to everything and then some. I mean, look at Jake Roberts or Barry Windham.... need i say more? The man, IMO, is a pioneer of pro-wrestling in that his story will no doubt inspire many future stars within the business to overcome their personal demons and live up to their potential.

Goodbye, Eddie. I will miss you quite alot. On this earth, you inspired me greatly. Your death has only inspired me more, onehundredfold. It's a shame that i'll never see your Frog splash again. It's a shame that i'll never see the Los Guerreros reunion i was waiting for. It's a shame that a second run with the World title didn't materialize in time. It's a shame that i'll never see your antics on television ever again. You've left quite a vacuum, Eddie. Not just on the Smackdown roster, but in all of our collective hearts. In closing, all i have to say is thank you for helping me get through my Freshman year of college last year. In your last years, you displayed a fortitude that eludes many people throughout their entire life. Had i not been privy to your struggle with vices and success in overcoming them, i might not be where i am today. Thank you for entertaining me and being a performer that truly gave pro-wrestling a better name.

I'm sure you've reunited with the Love Machine and your father by now. I'd imagine you're putting on classics with the likes of Kerry Von Erich and Owen Hart as we speak. In fact, i'd say the first card you wrestled on in heaven looked something like this:

Bruiser Brody vs. Andre The Giant.

Buddy Rogers vs. Lou Thesz.

Gory Guerrero, Eddie Guerrero, and Art Barr vs. Fritz, Kerry, and David Von Erich.

Jumbo Tsuruta and Giant Baba vs. Owent Hart and Davey Boy Smith.

Terry Gordy vs. Ray Stevens.

Adrian Adonis and Rick Rude vs. Curt Henning and Eddie Gilbert.

:)

RIP.

Mist spew time: Pat McNEIL is about to get served.

I've never been a fan of Pat Mcneil. I've always found the content of his columns insipid, and sometimes totally off the marker, at best. Compared to strong writers like David Meltzer, Wade Keller, and James Caldwell (who has impressed me over and over with his great write-ups ever since he joined the team not so long ago), Mcneil makes himself seem like he's deadweight. When he does post a write-up (which is somewhat of a rarity), it's almost always unprovocative and leaves me with an "okay, that was extremely pointless" kind of feeling.

His latest piece of work really set me off, and inspired me to write in a response:

The Top Seven: Based on the ESPN Classic gimmick show of the same name, here are the Top Seven Reasons You Can't Blame TNA For Putting the NWA Title Back On Jeff Jarrett.

7) Jarrett's only the transition champion. This is an argument that has been thrown around ever since the move to Jarrett was announced. Sure, Jarrett is almost guaranteed to keep the belt through October, but eventually, after a few more months or so, Jarrett will do the right thing and drop the title before settling into the "permanent heel challenger" role.

Jarret is not the calibur performer for the role of the "permanent heel challenger" let alone shouldn't be anywhere near that belt. It may sound redundant and cliche, but TNA will NOT succeed if it is built around JJ. He simply does not have what it takes across the board to rise to that level. Is he terrible? Not at all. Is he mediocre? Yes. Now should someone who is mediocre in terms of practically everything really be at the helm of the promotion?

6) Jarrett's got a different heel stable idea. Sure, Double J has attempted to rip off the New World Order, The Wolfpac, D-Generation X, Evolution and even the Truth Commission in his previous heel stable ideas, but not once has Jeff attempted to rip off the Four Horsemen. That's what makes his alliance with America's Most Wanted special.

I don't see how this supports his argument at all.... so Jarret has a new stable idea.... that doesn't change the fact that it's still boring old Jarret who is leading the pack.

5) The NWA World Title doesn't even matter any more. Jarrett has that role as a sop to the old school fans, the hundreds that are flocking to see guys like Dusty Rhodes and Terry Funk on Tony Hunter's Carolina Championship Wrestling shows. The hardcore internet fans know that the real action is in the NWA's X Division, with guys like Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels and TNA's main man, Allen James Styles.

One, i seriously doubt that old school fans are "flocking" to see Jarret, given the fact that Jarret's only exposure was in the WWE as a mid-carder and in WCW during its dying years. Let alone the fact that Dusty Rhodes and Terry Funk's days on top were long before Jarret's career even began in mainstream pro-wrestling.

Two, if your World title is lacking in prestige, that's not something you should be passive about. The World title is usually on the top of the card, and in many ways embodies the promotion in and of itself. If Nash/Jarret embodies your promotion, then your promotion is going to look very mediocre.

4) Name Recognition. Even though TNA's advertising on Spike TV has been all about insanely athletic guys performing incredibly acrobatic moves, that's not what wrestling fans want to see. Wrestling fans want to see familiar faces on their wrestling shows. That's why TNA took surveys at your finer strip malls and determined that Kevin Nash and Jeff Jarrett were the two most recognizable names on the roster, especially among people who aren't wrestling fans. Tito Ortiz scored high on the name recognition survey too, but that may have been due to older fans confusing him with "El Matador" Tito Santana.

What good is "name recognition" if you don't have "big names" that can draw effectively? Kevin Nash and Jeff Jarret have both proven time and time again that they cannot draw on their own. By this logic, you might as well bring in Koko B. Ware, Tony Atlas, or Hercules Hernandez and push them to the moon. Same deal.

IMO, i think it was a mistake for TNA to not push the reset button before the inaugural episode of Impact on Spike. It would've been the perfect opportunity to introduce the fans to the new stars and you wouldn't have to push old stars out of fear that the fans would turn on the new stars if you pushed them right off the bat.

Shouldn't people in the pro-wrestling business have learned by now that the fickle, casual fans who are soley into the entertainment aspect are not going to come back unless the wrestlers start ripping their arms off on television? Here's a novel approach - start catering to people who are ACTUALLY WRESTLING FANS! Marks and internet fans alike. Marks may be fickle, but the bottom line is they are just as much wrestling fans as the internet crowd. It will be quiet at first, but it will cause a rift, which eventually could lead to the creation of new fans. And if it doesn't? So what? IMO, the pandering to the casual fans is all part of a big misconception. To illustrate my point, think of 8 lamps. Now turn some of them off. This, IMO, is a manifestation of the pro-wrestling fanbase today. All you have to do is turn those lamps back on, not necessarily buy new ones altogether.

3) The WCW Factor. World Championship Wrestling has been off the air for nearly five years, yet statistical evidence showed that most WCW fans never made the jump to WWE, or didn't stick around once they got their first taste of Raw and Smackdown. Clearly there are people clamoring to see a rebirth of WCW. TNA doesn't have Chris Benoit, Booker T, Hulk Hogan, Road Warrior Animal and Ric Flair. Scott Steiner is in no shape to wrestle, and neither is Sid Vicious. Sting, Diamond Dallas Page and Bill Goldberg want too much money. But TNA does have Kevin Nash and Jeff Jarrett, which was once a main event storyline for World Championship Wrestling. Plus, they can deliver. Jarrett and Nash had a pay-per-view match several months ago at Against All Odds which has to be considered one of the fifty or sixty best TNA matches of 2005.

This has to be the worst argument of the seven. Yes, Jarret and Nash headlined WCW..... during the time when the company was in its last throes.... not that i necessarily blame that fact on either men or the feud itself, but the fact that the crowds they were performing for were in some cases below the 10,000 mark kind of detracts from his point of immediate recognition among the casual fans.

2) TNA employees are loyal to Jeff Jarrett. Jeff Jarrett is the guy who originally hired most everyone in the TNA front office, including the booking committee. Plus, Jarrett and his daddy run the company and own a percentage of it. Without the Jarretts, people like Scott D'Amore, Jeremy Borash and David Sahadi would have to work at (*gasp*) regular jobs in order to make money. TNA's wrestlers would be in OVW, indy purgatory or grinding out a living under the boot of Vince McMahon. Why not show a little appreciation to the founder of wrestling's number one alternative? 

First of all, that was then, this is now. Were it not for Dixie Carter and Panda Energy, TNA might have been dead or in the same place it was long ago. Second, it's obvious that the only reason Jerry and Jeff started pushing TNA forward to the next level was so that it could serve as a vehicle for Jeff to establish him as a key figure in the pro-wrestling business, plain and simple. IMO, the Jarrets deserve no credit, nor any respect from anyone. Scott D'Amore and compnay may have been hired by Jeff, but the same people he hired were the ones that took the ball, ran with it, and made it something, unlike Jeff and Jerry.

As far as loyalty goes.... i'm not involved with the company, but from what i know, it's really only Borash and Sahidi who are the Jarret loyalists in the book.

1) Kevin Nash vs. Raven would just be silly.

...... How about continuing the feud with Rhino? Why does Kevin nash have to be a permanent part of this equation to begin with?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which leads me to belive that Mcneil's column is a "work", or a joke played on Internet fans like myself who have a tendency to take things a little to seriously every now and then, and fail to see through the sarcasm. Remember, this is a guy who pimped Dusty's booking, conceived the absolute worst Wrestlemania "dream card" of all time, and is currently trying to help lift some of the blame for TNA's hardships off of JJ, who for the most part, deserves every single bit of it. Smell a little fishy?

If it's not just a joke, well.... everyone can have their opinion, but..... Mcneil is seriously out of touch with a few things.....


ROH! ROH! ROH! The biggest order i've ever made.

Well, i've made over $600 chauffeuring this summer, and i think it's about time i reap the fruits of my labor. Thanks to the $10 sale over at ROHwrestling.com, i was able to buy 11 great shows for the price of $140!.... Okay, so maybe that's not the best deal in the whole wide world, but i'm still happy the order didn't break the $200. Tell me what you think. Were these shows worth the price of admission?

2002

Unscripted

Glory By Honor

All Star Extravaganza

Scramble Madness

2003

Main Event Spectacles

2004

Reborn Stage Two

Generation Next

World Title Classic

Reborn Completion (i've heard it's kind of weak match wise, but very important storyline wise)

2005

Manhattan Mayhem

Death Before Dishonor III

All soon to be a part of this collection:

2002

The Era of Honor Begins

Round Robin Challenge

Night of Appreciation

Road to the Title

Night of the Butcher

Final Battle 2002

2003

One Year Anniversary Show

The Epic Encounter

Retribution: Round Robin Challenge II

Death Before Dishonor

Glory by Honor II

Final Battle 2003

2004

Midnight Express Reunion

Weekend Of Thunder Nights 1 & 2

Final Battle 2004

*blows off dust* Whew, it's certainly been a while! My RAW Reax to PWTorch.

"Alex of Long Island, New York (7.0) Best match: Matt Hardy vs. Edge. Worst match: Pretty much everything else.

This week's episode of RAW would've gotten an eight were it not for one man: Chris Masters. This man is not ready, plain and simple. He's not completely without some positive qualities (and i'm being very generous when i say that), but he is far too underdeveloped as an all around performer to be anywhere near the main event. I guess after a year of non stop excitement, Shelton has been permanently relegated as the big cog in the machine. Let's see...... Masters has been on TV for almost 5 months now and he still has no heat. Shelton on the other hand, while not blowing the roof off when he walks down the aisle, connects with the fans in the ring. Here's a novel idea: push the latter. As cliche as Mcmahon bashing may be these days, what the hell is he drinking? How can anyone who tells Paul London pointblank that he can't work a match whilst pushing Chris Masters possibly still be in touch with the wrestling business? That's like telling a hot dog that it doesn't taste good with mustard and then putting mustard on a PB and J sandwich to eat immediately after. Onto the positves side of things, the Matt Hardy/Edge brawl was amazing, and in my opinion, Hardy's best single performance ever. Despite terrible booking decisions, Hardy has managed to keep his fanbase more or less intact, and it showed every single minute of this match. His comebacks coupled with his amazing selling job rivaled that of HBK. Johnny Ace must be steaming. I thought the ending was terrific and perfectly fitting. The idea of the match was that someone was going to get hurt, one way or the other, and someone did: both men. I wasn't too pleased with the Cena/Angle segment. Hopefully, they'll improve upon that in the coming weeks."

My letter i sent to PWTorch.

"In the calm words of J.R. at the Montreal screwjob: "What happened?" Last night's episode of RAW shouldn't have gone the way it did. It should've been a turning point for the company. I don't think we'll see a boom again for quite some time, but stars like Cena, Batista, Randy Orton, Shelton Benjamin, can garner in some great business. I haven't been this infuriated with an episode of RAW since the summer of 2004 when bad booking decisions were so common that they were practically glorified by whomever it was that greenlighted them. Half of the show felt like a run of the mill episode of Heat or Experience. I don't watch RAW to see a ridiculous amount of clips from Wrestlemania. I watch for the actual sports entertainment.

HHH had no business opening up the show with his little, guttural, patented-concession speech. I agree 100% with Guttman, this should've been the time for the new champ to share his thoughts and try to connect with the fans. I think everyone can agree that now that Batista is the champ, he needs far more exposure and focus than what he was given last night (and better material to work with on the mic, for the love of virgin mary).

If last night's RAW served as any indication, Big Dave's reign is heading straight down the same toilet as Benoit's. I was happy that they at least had the mindfulness to book his first title defense on the main event. However, to have him totally obliterate Orton cleanly, and in turn flush a possible money match down the toilet, was the worst decision of the night. In fact, THAT should be our main event at Backlash. Hunter and Batista have shown that they have a good chemistry across the board, but i'm tired of that feud. We all got our payoff, so why not wait until Summerslam when we'll be just as excited as we were to see it at WM21? What the hell are they thinking over at Titan towers? "Yeah, the cowboy's son didn't get over as a face, so let's take this commodity we've been emphatically promoting to the world as our biggest prospect for the past 2 years, and kill him. The fans won't notice.... they're too dumb and nerdy.... or something." Hopefully, this was just an off night. If not, it's going to be a long, hard 3rd and 4th quarters.

Alex of Purchase, New York"

Michael Moore = faliure of a human being.

So we were talking about the adverse effects fast food can have on one's health today in class, and it made me think of a joke Chris Rock told at the Oscars a few weeks ago: "Michael Moore now is wishing he did Super Size me. Not only did it get nominated, but he would've had all the research done long before he even started filming." Yeah, it didn't go exactly like that, but if you can comprehend what's written in those Bernstein Bears books, i'm sure you'll get the gist.

So of course, that got me thinking of Michael Moore, everyone's favorite lard-ass, political propandist, opportunistic demagogue. That man is one of the saddest human beings on the face of the earth at this moment. Sure, he gets the money. Sure, he gets the chicks through copious amounts of that same money, but he'll never have one thing many of us CAN have - a true feeling of accomplishment. People like Michael Moore can NEVER be fulfilled where they need it. Like many others, when the camera is finally off of him (which would seem damn near impossible, since you need 10 cameras as it is to film a program where the fat f**ck makes an appearance, just so you could see the other people involved in the TV program.), the lights have been shut off, and the mics have been unplugged..... there sits Michael atop of all his dirty capital.... whistling in the dark, making the kind of face someone would make when they're pushing out a really bad case of the runs.

However, being the good sammaritan that i am, i can't help but feel somewhat sorry for Mr. Moore. Here's a guy that was an icon. Not just in the political world, but in american pop culture. It seemed as if he was destined to be etched in the annals of American history, since it appeared that many were buying into what he was feeding them, and that he would be the first "pundit"/activist to have an unprecedented and profound amount of influence on the constituency, not seen before. After 2 successful box office hits, he was the talk of the town. Then, something happened. Something that even i myself to this day 4 months later can't believe i witnessed - George W. Bush, the impetus of Mr. Moore's moneymaking scheme and livelihood was re-elected! Worse yet, he not only won the most electoral votes, but the popular vote as well! (though both by a slim margin.) Now, with no idea what to do, and no one to tell him what to do.... Michael Moore had dug himself into a quagmire. His arch-rival, and man that he had been calling an idiot for the past two years, George W. Bush, had outdone him. Michael Moore would then do what some would naturally do in this embarassing situation - run away and hide. Yep.

To me, Michael Moore is no different than some 2-bit pimp on the street. One way or the other, both a pimp and Michael Moore's job can be summed up as exploitation for financial gain. So keep whistling Michael and soak up what you have left, which is VERY little, to say the least. You're dematerializing quicker than you think.

Note: Let me add that i do think the films, Faranheit 9/11 and Bowling for coumbine, do present valid points to some degree, despite the man who made them. And just for the record, if i had to label myself politically, i'd say that i'm a moderate-leftist.

The college chronicles - Am i below the glass ceiling?

Professor's can be such dickheads. There's no lighter or more eloquent way to put it. Some of them are downright sadistic bastards. One, in particular, is my Preceptorial professor. Think of the class as a philosophy/fine literature course. The class is a lecture/discussion hybrid, so every class i'm forced to sit through and be innundated with garbled up nonsense from a bunch of snivveling pinkos and other radical ideologues. It's far more nerve racking than it may sound. Damn pinkos and liberal ideologues. You tossers are the reason why moderates like myself get our asses kicked by the righties every election, when we're out of Clinton's and Kennedy's.

This one girl (who looks sexy as hell when she wears her glasses) works my last nerve every class. I barely ever say a word during that class, but each and every time she opens her mouth and spews out her half baked garbage makes me want to stand up and mock execute her, right then and there, though a Moe Green special right through the glasses would be just as swell. So, anyway, the workload is even worse. Even worse than the workload, my professor seems to favor all the aforementioned students. Most of the professors i've come across rub me as ideologues, so i guess you wouldn't even have to put 2 and 2 together for that one.

The guy seems to have a real hard on for me. Now, i'm no Edgar Allen Poe, but he has terribly underrated the papers i've handed in since day one. I literally drop my blood, sweat, and tears into these papers, and for each one, he's given me a B-. Not a C. Not a D. Just a B-. Like i said before, i'm not exactly writing War and Peace here, but it's far more than he gives it credit for. I spent at least 5 - 6 hours per paper in the beginning. Then, for a little experiment, i upped the ante and moved it up to 12 hours. Everything i write is based on solid facts. Still, no change. There's no doubt in my mind that he gives me B-'s because they wouldn't evoke suspicion, unlike D's and C's. Pretty smart.

I've adhered to every single one of Mr. 3 phd's little, clever, sarcastic comments he writes throughout the paper, and still no change. Hell, i even went up to him a few times, and told him that he misinterpreted what i was saying. Probably wasn't the best idea in retorspect. In addition to that, i was looking around at some of the other papers, and most of the kids that got A's were the kids who talk alot, and kiss his ass during after class. I've never been a kiss-ass kind of guy. Never have, never will. Damn this glass ceiling.

[/whiny Edge-esque rant]

Ahhh...... i needed that. :)

Rate my purchases.

I just purchased these fine items off of ebay for a whopping total of $18 altogether:

WCW Hogwild 1996:

The cover art might not make alot of sense, but the card sure does:

Rey Mysterio Jr. vs. Ultimo Dragon.

Chris Benoit vs. Dean Malenko.

Ric Flair (who i forgot had been relegated to the mid card around that time.) vs. Eddie Guerrero.

The Steiner Brothers vs. Harlem Heat.

And a double main event, both of which are pretty decent, from what i've heard:

"Hollywood" Hulk Hogan vs. The Giant.

The Outsiders vs. Sting & Luger.

The best of Ricky Steamboat in Japan:

Forgot the actual list of matches, but i remember matches with Jumbo Tsuruta, Flair, Kensuke Sasaki, Misawa as Tiger mask II, and a series with the Superfly catching my eye.

Your thoughts?

  • 13 results
  • 1
  • 2