aebghdfsc's forum posts

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@Born_Lucky said:

Pot destroys brain cells and lungs at the same time, as well as causing mouth and throat cancer.

What kind of an idiot thinks that breathing huge amounts of poisonous smoke into your lungs, is a good idea?

When cocaine was legal - doctors all over the country begged the government to make it illegal,

Suicides, self mutilation, violent attacks and and dozens of drug related health problems, were destroying whole towns.

And now - the uneducated morons, who know nothing of history, and the ignorant hillbillies, want to make drugs legal - and go down that road again .

Yeah, it's sad, isn't it? Down the road and off the cliff like lemmings.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@ps4hasnogames said:

if someone wants to use a drug he will use it regardless if its legal or not. look at cigarretes, the majority of the population doesn't smoke. but having a "war" on drugs just puts non-violent offenders in jail, wastes BILLIONS of your tax-paying dollars, and because of the criminality of drugs that the government invented it leads to people killing one another for drug turf. If drugs were sold in stores it would put all the drug dealers and gangsters out of business reducing crime.

you lost.

No, you lose for being a druggie.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts
@Naquada said:

I'd be for legalizing drugs... And the options given the current situation don't leave a lot of room for interpretation, IMHO.

Current - Drugs are illegal. Entire criminal organizations have sprouted around this, leading to excessive amounts of crime and murder. The money funneled into drugs makes cartels more powerful and wealthy; the money funneled into the war on drugs is flushed, more often than not resulting in lives lost on both sides to accomplish nothing. Drugs are unregulated, and unsafe, costing millions in lives and emergency room visits. Drugs are laced with chemicals you'd never willingly ingest, and needles are shared, spreading disease and death. Treatment is stigmatized, because you have to admit to doing something criminal to get help and, because of the "war on drugs", you're looked down upon for being a criminal 'junkie'. Tougher access to drugs doesn't mean harder to get, but rather harder to pay for, leading to a spike in drug related criminal activity to procure the funds for purchase, assuming they take that route instead of resorting to selling themselves for it.

Decriminalized - drug cartels go the way of the dodo. It's hard to run a criminal empire on something easy and cheap to obtain legally (corporate hate aside). Money from sales goes into businesses and taxes. Drugs are regulated, safer, and there is no stigma associated with purchasing them, and they're likely cheaper... Far so, in some cases. Clean, easily obtained needles lead to less disease. Treatment is easier to get, with the programs possibly even being paid for with the tax money generated from the drugs themselves, along with more money for education, similar to smoking / alcohol. Our drug habit isn't causing thousands of deaths in other countries (and our own). Prison populations go down. Way, way down. Law enforcement time and resources can be reallocated to other activities.

Problems that might still exist are obvious - petty theft to obtain it from stores, vehicular and related deaths from doing things you shouldn't during use, deaths related to overdose. However, these problems exist and will exist regardless. I don't know about everyone else, but to me the "War on drugs" has been one of the largest wastes of money and lives of the last half century.

In other words, you're a druggie who wants to get high legally.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@l34052 said:

@aebghdfsc said:

Legalizing drugs doesn't benefit anything or anyone, except for druggies. Every argument I've ever heard for legalizing drugs were from drug users themselves. You mean to tell me we need to start listening to such people?

When you develop a mature enough brain that can actually think rationally this conversation can continue, until then move along folks nothing to see here im afraid.

Yawn. Another druggie that thinks I'm wrong.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@undergroundLPx said:

I am not an user, never have been, and I fully support the legalization of it.

Assuming you're telling the truth, why?

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@doozie78 said:

@aebghdfsc said:

Get it through your stoned heads: Only stoners support legalizing pot and other drugs. No exceptions.

There must be a shit-ton of stoners across the nation and even in congress then! I'll be sure to make a nice post for you here once it's said and done. xD

Obviously.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

Get it through your stoned heads: Only stoners support legalizing pot and other drugs. No exceptions.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@aebghdfsc said:

And how do stoners expect to be taken seriously when they justify their recreational usage by saying it has medicinal benefits? What, does it relieve their boredom? I don't recall boredom being mentioned in a medical dictionary.

Has anyone in that thread made that argument? The only people I saw say anything like that was to debunk your nonsense that weed is dangerous.

You said it's bad for your health, well prove it. And even if it is bad for you, why does that mean it should be illegal?

Typical stoner rhetoric.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts

@doozie78: Still not buying it. Find me an actual drug-free person who thinks I'm wrong and I'll accept that I was wrong.

Avatar image for aebghdfsc
aebghdfsc

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 aebghdfsc
Member since 2014 • 85 Posts
@killzowned24 said:

@aebghdfsc said:

@killzowned24 said:

They're retards because they don't see the benefits hugely outweigh any cons. Just these 4 alone, make the law look ridiculous.

1. The drug is very safe. You would die overdosing on coffee before weed

2. Massive amounts of money to be made

3. New jobs ranging from everything from gardening to bud tender

4. Millions saved every year on arrests and trials.

Good luck finding someone who doesn't smoke weed that believes that bunk.

That ain't bunk, it's straight up facts and is very easy for anyone to see without blindfolds on. lol

Okay, even if it was true, that doesn't change the fact that only stoners are pro-legalization.