Im sorry if you dont have that skill but me and most other people can get a pretty good idea of what a game is like , how it plays and whether we would like it or not by watching videos of it and reading reviews. its how i choose what games i am going to play.Sp far i haven't played a game i didn't like when chosen this way.Im pretty sure most other people are like me.The less money you have to spare on games the better you get at choosing the rights ones trust me.
Danny is obviously spoiled by having so many game at his access, he cant possibly understand whats it like to be an average gamer on a budget.I mean he think its easy for people to spend £60 for a game they not sure about.
Ehm your sandwich analogy is no good. If sandwiches cost £60 each and it took 1-6 years to make one, then im pretty sure people would have more to say about them. They also would learn to look at the thing and ingredients and judge if they would like it or not BEFORE SPENDING £60!! Actually i can tell by looking at and smelling sandwiches already if i would like them or not.
Ok what game is that at 02:05 please? The one where the geek is playing on an arcade game tron? its looks like a a cool old school game. It looks good, i think i might like it.
The same??? maybe unreal 1 did. but unreal 2 and 3 and now 4 all have very unique looks for their respective games. Still theres plenty of choices out there and publishers do use other engines, you have so many out there , not everyone uses unreal .You have cryengine, frostbite, etc Most big publishers will have their own engines. Unreal is great as it allows low level companies produce modern games with little money.
With so many mods, and shooters and fps outr there, there doesnt seem t0 be any point in making a game like unreal tournament. A game like that would be better of being a mod to an existing engine/game. In fact im surprised no one has so far. If epic games really has gone then maybe the copyright will be gone too, and someone might do it.
what on games?? so do pc owners eventually, that not an argument... unless you pirate your games which further proves that you are a little kid who dont have the money for a console or a decent pc. Next normal working people find it a hell of alot easier to pay money slowly than all up front, why you think adults have credit cards?
/facepalm again, whats is wrong with you? I am a pc man, and i know for a fact that a mid range pc is not that far ahead in graphics of a PS 4.You are greatly exaggerating what developers are doing for the pc, they have the hardware but not the development.
in regards to your tomb raider question I said similar not exactly the same, thats why. Your probably full of bs anyway and didnt even test the fps of tomb raider, people like you often lie.
Next a 550ti is only 3 years old...
You think im talking out my ass when i tell you that all consoles and pc and ps4 version of games have the exact same polygon count, effetcs and textures. That makes you an idiot who doesn't actually play games on both systems then , as ask anyone whos played Skyrim on both systems what they think. That was 360 vs pc, and now the ps 4 is more powerful.
Seriously you are deluded if you thik the pc is "that far ahead" in graphics. It isn't. The pc has the "potential" to be more ahead and does have the higher "possible" resolutions . That's all.
Its hilarious that your argument as to why the pc is " 4 yeasr ahead" is that its can play games at 60 fps vs ps 45 fps? LOL what pc? and in 4 years all pc can do is add 15 fps? what where they doing in those 4 years??
We both trying to push our arguments but your argument makes way less sense the pc Is Not 4-5 years ahead in gaming rofl.
Have you even seen areal console ? have you actually played ps4 yet or you talking complete bs? you only have a $500 pc so my guess is you cant even afford a ps 4 lol.So unless you actually have a £2000 pc and a ps 4 like me, you can not compare with what i seen ye?
/faceplam avery04, you have no clue what you talking about sorry no offense. first of all 81 mill to 76 mill is hardly smashed when you consider the launch date differences . Second 360 was NEVER A 720p machine, it ran it sgames at 600p and upscaled to 720p. lastly the 360 WAS NOT UNDERPOWERED compared to ps 3, where do these noobs get their infor from? a cornflakes box?
The ps 3 had a powerful cpu ie the cell, which was better than the 36o ibm cpu, but games need more gpu power than cpu power. So when you consider no one knew how to code the cell properly and used it like a dual core cpu, and then add in the fact that ps 3's gpu WAS IN FACT WEAKER than the 360s , you get the full picture that the 360 was in fact at about the same processing power as the ps 3, or perhaps even better.
Now on to games, If you have a decent pc i see no reason to get a xbone, but since sony has some decent exclusives i can see why someone would want a ps 4.
Oh and one more thing. times have changed, people are smarter now, they under stand specs now, when they didnt care or understand before ( it was all about games during the snes days). People wwant the best now, and will get annoyed if they get short changed. Thast a fact.
Before watching this video i saw the title xbone 1080p difficulties explained. I was like what the hell is there to explain? It cant do it, cause its weaker badly, and even if the xbone catches up that means the ps 4 will get ahead again as software improvements occur on both sides, that's why ps4 will always be stronger !! PS4 and PC all the way.
Im not even a console fan bo let alone a sony one ( in fact i hated ps 3) so i can only imagine the glee in all the sony fanboys eyes. lol. I always go for the winner, im a glory hunter.
amar1234's comments